Property taxes will need to increase by about seven percent in the fall to cover the cost of Cambridge’s first billion-dollar-plus budget, passed during Monday’s City Council meeting. The amount represents a four percent increase in city operating expenses. Fiscal headwinds are blowing across the region, driven by uncertain economic conditions and a notable downturn in the biotech industry. The value of commercial properties has decreased, lowering what cities can collect in tax revenues. Last September, the Massachusetts Municipal Association warned cities and towns of “a perfect storm” financially.
Cambridge has weathered these conditions better than some — it won’t be cutting services in FY 2027. It will spend less on capital improvements than in previous years. But other Bay State municipalities have had to make tough choices on spending cuts in the face of inflation-driven cost increases and greatly diminished federal funding. Some communities have put before voters, Proposition 2 ½ overrides, which allow cities and towns to raise property taxes more than the state-mandated maximum increase of two and a half percent.
“When you look at the financial picture that’s out there, and you look at what other communities are going through … and you look at our budget, it is really remarkable,” said Councillor Marc McGovern. He noted pressures to cut spending have hit economically advantaged and disadvantaged communities alike.
In an April interview, though, City Manager Yi-An Huang hinted that Cambridge is getting close to hitting its levy limit for the commercial property tax rate, which may necessitate higher increases on the residential side of the equation. For this year, though, he plans to recommend a residential property tax rate that’s relatively level with recent years – a matter the council will not take up until September.
The total amount budgeted for the city’s general fund comes to about $1.018 billion. That, plus, $15 million in annual funding for Cambridge’s water department, which is budgeted separately, brings the total annual operating budget of city to about $1.033 billion.
Councillor Patty Nolan, co-chair of the council’s finance committee, called this year’s budget “phenomenal.”
“It’s a real testament to our council priorities, our city’s values, and the fact that we made it through here without needing to cut things,” she said. The city also approved a public investment budget of about $45 million. (The city budgets “capital assets” that last over five years – like infrastructure projects – separately.) This amount, in combination with about $110 million in bond authorizations for specific projects, brings the total amount the city will spend on capital improvements for things like sewers, roads, and building renovations to about $155 million.
The budget breakdown
Minor amendments were made to the budget presented to city council for consideration back in April. They include additional funding for the city’s housing department that will go toward work on plans to develop social housing, as well as increased services for immigrant families in Cambridge through the Department of Equity and Inclusion.
Some of the largest line items continued to be for cornerstone services: public works, police and the fire department. The increase in the budget compared to FY 2026 was driven in part by increased funding for schools and a cost-of-living adjustment for the salaries of Cambridge municipal staff. About 15 percent of the budget will go toward paying benefits for current and former city employees, and about 11 percent (about $114 million) to paying off debt.
Cambridge’s current total debt currently stands at $707 million, not including bond authorizations just approved by council. The city’s net debt (which doesn’t include debt that is paid for by water and sewer rates) currently stands at about $594 million – roughly $4,900 per Cambridge resident. For comparison, at the end of fiscal year 2025, Boston has a total primary government debt of about $2.4 billion, amounting to roughly $3,400 per resident, although Boston’s debt represents a higher proportion of its overall property tax base (one percent) than Cambridge’s (0.7 percent).
The budget was not approved unanimously, as Councillor Ayah Al-Zubi voted “present” for the general fund. Al-Zubi serves as Nolan’s co-chair on the finance committee.
“I view a budget as a moral document,” she said. “I just don’t think it’s doing enough for low- and middle-income people,” she added, referencing frustration among Cambridge Public Schools (CPS) staff for lower-than-expected funding for roles like paraprofessionals and substitute teachers.
McGovern disagreed.
“Because we have been so financially strong for so long, and we do so many things, there’s always this tendency to say ‘more, more.’ I think this budget does take care of working people,” he said.
He also clarified that budgeting decisions made within CPS are decided by the Cambridge School Committee, while city council only has the authority to approve the overarching amount.
Multiple councillors commended city staff for their preparation ahead of this year’s budget.
“I really think that this year the process has been a lot better than in past years,” said Vice Mayor Burhan Azeem ahead of the vote to adopt the budget. “I think that there’s been explicit public input, a lot more bringing us along, a lot more details about the whole process.”
A stronger
Please consider making a financial contribution to maintain, expand and improve Cambridge Day.
We are now a 501(c)(3) nonprofit and all donations are tax deductible.
Please consider a recurring contribution.
Taxes going up 7%. That means in most cases rent is going up about 5%.
Great work from city council in making Cambridge more affordable!
McGovern and Nolan don’t get it. What is remarkable Mr. McGovern? An increase of 6% per annum during the last decade? What is phenomenal Ms. Nolan? The waste that it is in the budget and the fact that you, and the council refuse to have an ombudsman to point out the fat and cut it out?
Economic middle class people have moved and will continue to move out because of taxes. Don’t tell us that our taxes are lower than surrounding communities. Relativity doesn’t matter. What does matter is that a 7% incrase translates to a doubling of taxes every ten years. Stop the spending. The last 10% of any spending can be cut out without causing any probelms.
Isnt it amazing how people can stare fiscal collapse in the face and scream”we need mooooorrrree”.
The city’s budget bloats year by year with handouts to lottery winners and buying market rate housing and turning it into more giveaways. We celebrate housing more and more people who can’t pay for anything while asking those who are already subsidizing all these lives to subsidize more.
Meanwhile our main streets are absolutely devastated. Central square is 50% vacant and growing. Mid Cambridge between central and harvard is full of empty office buildings and storefronts.
Harvard square can only find national chains to fill its storefronts.
But yes, lets tax more take more demolish more public space and put up 100% affordable towers so more people who have to be fully supported by the city move in.
Then the true dream will be achieved. A paradise with no commercial activity, no amenities, and dozens more towers full of people who cant pay taxes.
How can the Co-chair of the Finance Committee, Al Zubi, vote “present”, essentially a “no” vote for this years city budget?
She contributed practically nothing of substance during every single Finance meeting. She didn’t even realize the City Council has NO say over the school budget. She claims the Budget is a moral document for her when she doesn’t even understand how any of it works.
Even Mayor Siddiqui was frustrated by the childish and disruptive behavior from Al Zubi and got caught on a hot mic saying “she makes me crazy, she makes me crazy”.
We can all relate Mayor Siddiqui.
Maybe there should be a clause that all City Councilors need to have a real job before they are eligible to run for office.