U.S. youth observe Cuba’s elections – and learn about real democracy
Cuba held elections for its organs of local government, the Municipal Assemblies of People’s Power, on Nov. 27. A delegation of youth from the United States observed the vote firsthand as part of the U.S.-Cuba Youth Friendship Meeting.
Coming from the fundamentally undemocratic U.S. empire, it was the first time that many participants saw a functional electoral system in which the masses actually participate, and in which the majority truly rules.
We observed voting in La Corbata, a neighborhood in La Habana undergoing transformation.
The polling site was inside a newly constructed cultural-technological center, which also houses arts programs, classes, a computer lab, school graduations and community events.
At first arrival, we were surprised by how efficiently the voting process moved. There were not long lines at the La Corbata polling site, while in the United States it is typical for voters – especially in poorer neighborhoods – to wait in lines for hours to cast their ballot.
A local election official explained that all citizens and permanent residents of Cuba are automatically registered to vote at age 16. At 18, they are eligible to be nominated to run as a delegate.
The nomination process happens in the weeks leading up to the election. Between Oct. 21 and Nov. 18, more than 6 million voters – 73 percent of those eligible – attended the neighborhood assemblies for the nomination of candidates.
Nominees are chosen by local community groups, including the Committees in Defense of the Revolution, the country’s largest mass organization, with more than 8.4 million members out of a population of 11 million; the Cuban Federation of Women, whose membership includes more than 85 percent of all eligible Cuban women over 14 years of age; and the Communist Party of Cuba.
The Communist Party of Cuba is not an electoral party; it does not “hand-pick” candidates; and party membership is not a requirement to run for office at all.
Before the election, the National Electoral Council goes house to house to verify voters’ information. This year, after Hurricane Ian devastated the Pinar del Río province in the west, election officials surveyed people still evacuated or sheltering there to ensure they would have voting access.
Cuban elections are always held on Sundays, so voters are not restricted by their workdays to participate in democracy.
On Nov. 27, polls opened at 7 a.m. and were scheduled to close at 6 p.m. The National Electoral Council used the power granted by the Cuban Constitution to extend the polling hours throughout the country for one more hour so that a greater number of citizens could exercise their right to vote.
In the United States, elections that are scheduled on Tuesdays during work hours – combined with the inaccessibility of polling sites, strict ID requirements, racist voter intimidation and a general lack of civic education – impede most of the working class from participating.
The United States pushes the falsehood that Cuban elections are “not competitive.” In reality, every Cuban municipality must have at least two to eight candidates running to ensure that voters have a choice. In La Corbata, three candidates were running, all of whom were women.
Competitiveness in U.S. elections has continued to plummet as corporations expand their monopoly over our ostensible democracy, or rather, oligarchy. In the November midterms, less than 8 percent of U.S. Congressional districts were considered competitive.
When Cuban voters enter the polling station, they confirm their voter information, get a ballot with straightforward instructions and fill it out in a booth. Then they place their ballot in a box guarded by local elementary school students.
Youth have always worked at the forefront of the Cuban Revolution, so it is a very honorable role for them.
Any citizen can help in the public vote-counting process. Official results are reported the same day – unlike in the United States, despite it being one of the richest countries in the world with access to much more advanced technology than blockaded Cuba.
If no candidate gets more than 50 percent of the vote, the election moves to a runoff the following Sunday. This would be the case in 925 of Cuba’s municipalities after the Nov. 27 elections.
Moreover, the community can recall their representatives at any point once their terms begin.
Another key difference between U.S. and Cuban elections is that in Cuba, there is no “traditional” campaigning. The community-nominated candidates cannot spend money on campaigning, but they are still accessible to voters to discuss any issues.
Candidate biographies, highlighting their experience serving the community and their membership in different organizations, are posted outside polling places.
Voters make an informed decision based on the candidates’ genuine qualifications, not on flashy campaign mailers or attack ads made by Super PACs.
As a result, the energy at the polls was completely different than what is typical in the United States, where crowds of campaign volunteers or paid workers gather outside holding signs, passing out literature and urging voters to support their candidates.
Political violence often escalates outside of polling sites in the United States. During the most recent midterm elections, there were even armed militias intimidating voters at ballot drop boxes in some states.
In the United States, and all capitalist “democracies,” elections are determined by the amount of money invested in a campaign, which buys advertisements, mailers, staff and other resources to reach likely voters.
A record-breaking $9.3 billion was spent on federal elections during the U.S. midterms.
Political campaigns in the United States more closely resemble reality TV shows – sensational, polarizing and completely divorced from the material issues at hand.
North Americans’ shallow conception of democracy contributes to their confusion about the Cuban system. Some believe ridiculous anti-communist propaganda claiming that Cuba is staging its elections or paying actors to tell us lies.
It is easier for many North Americans to believe Cuba is lying about their democratic achievements – free health care and education, guaranteed housing and employment, constitutionally enshrined anti-racism and gender equality – than to come to terms with the fact that our own government is choosing to deny us those same rights.
The far more advanced character of Cuban socialist democracy is exactly why the United States is so intent on obfuscating and blockading Cuba’s reality. Their example shows us what is possible.
For more than 60 years, a small island of 11 million people has resisted the biggest, most violent empire in history. If a true workers’ democracy can be realized 90 miles from our shores, it can be realized here too, and in every corner of the world.
Calla Walsh is a college student from Cambridge and co-chair of the National Network on Cuba, a coalition of organizations across the United States described as fighting to end the U.S. war on Cuba.
A version of this essay appeared first on Multipolarista.
Is this a joke article?
Remarkable that this democracy voted those two Castros into office for 60 or so years. Must have done a great job…
I was going to write the same thing… is this opinion piece a joke?
Cuba has had a dictatorship for sixty plus years.
Calla Walsh should learn that the words democracy and Cuba are antithetical.
Shame on Cambridge Day for publiching this opinion piece. Marc Levy knows better
On further thought…Calla Walsh was educated at the Winsor School. What type of history course at Winsor taught her that Cuba was a democracy? Did she take a 20th century history course? How could Ms. Walsh be so naive.
These students should be offered the opportunity to travel in a dilapidated boat leaving Cuba and struggling to get to America – a boat filled with brave Cubans seeking freedom from a Communist dictatorship.
If Calla Walsh wants to see democracy in action, she should move to Vermont and see how towns are run by Selectboards. This is true democracy.
Walsh belongs to many Socialist organizations.
One might have thought that Cambridge Day would have put her opinion piece in perspective.
And then this. You can never trust the net, but…
This piece would almost be adorable if it weren’t so naive and misguided. As a native Cuban, now living in Massachusetts I completely share Ms. Walsh’s disdain for superPACs, disenfranchisement of many voters etc. etc. The U.S is not exactly an ode to the success of democracy or capitalism. However, Cuba is a communist dictatorship. There is nothing voluntary about membership in the CDR or the Communist party. Cuba does a great job on the PR side presenting objectively absurd, but romantic ideals of the country to naive visiting students and travelers, and Ms. Walsh fell for it hook, line, and sinker. We can perhaps agree that we need to focus on fixing the many problems we have in the U.S. but falling for the easy lies of another country’s broken leaders really doesn’t help us at all.