
Candidates for the Cambridge City Council filled a nearly two-hour forum with ideas for creating affordable housing in the city. Finding consensus on those ideas might be more of a challenge.
The forum on Sept. 10, hosted by A Better Cambridge, one of the cityโs independent-expenditure political action committees, or Super PACs, featured most of the candidates for City Council. Mayor E. Denise Simmons was absent for most of the forum due to a situation in which a local family was confronted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. The event moderator asked each candidate a set of questions based on their responses to an online questionnaire from ABC.
ABC has endorsed eight candidates: incumbents Burhan Azeem, vice mayor Marc McGovern, Sumbul Siddiqui, mayor E. Denise Simmons, Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler and Ayesha Wilson, as well as challengers Dana Bullister and Ned Melanson.
Social housing, a form of public housing with market elements, was discussed by several candidates. First-time candidate Ned Melanson pointed to Chicagoโs green social housing ordinance as a model for Cambridge. Chicagoโs city council in May approved a $135 million bond issue to invest in affordable, mixed-income and sustainable housing. Melanson said Cambridge could tie such housing to more sustainable transit than automobiles. He acknowledged that social housing was only part of the answer for creating affordable housing in Cambridge. โAt the end of the day, it’s just another tool in the tool kit,โ he said.
Chicago is the largest city in the United States to adopt social housing, which also exists in Atlanta and Chattanooga, Tennessee. Sobrinho-Wheeler said Cambridge โshould be thinking about exploring it,โ and could pay for such a measure by using its affordable housing trust. โIt’s a super common model in Europe,โ he added, but uncommon in the United States, though he mentioned Marylandโs Montgomery County as an example. He thinks Cambridge could be a city that jump-starts social housing, in particular because the state Legislature has passed a bill that could support the concept championed by Rep. Mike Connolly, who represents East Cambridge and East Somerville. โWe should be thinking about exploringโ social housing, Sobrinho-Wheeler said.
McGovern said he has been working with the Cambridge Housing Justice Coalition to explore how the city could leverage its bond rating to create social housing. โTo get shovels in the ground, we need to get these proposals in. We need to make some decisions. We’re going to need to make zoning changes.โ
Other multifamily ideas
Challenger Zion Sherin aims to offer incentives for the cityโs historic homes to be converted into co-ops and to use the cityโs AAA bond rating to secure loans, enabling nonprofits to build affordable multifamily units. But he stressed that these units would need to adhere to by-right development, which grants developers faster approval for following building codes and zoning rules.
Inclusionary housing, below-market-rate housing that prioritizes giving units to people in professions such as teaching, law enforcement, social work and nursing, was put forth by Peter Hsu, a returning challenger for the council. When asked how he would determine which occupations would qualify for priority, Hsu didnโt provide a concrete answer. He also didnโt explain further how he would craft a legal city program to achieve this goal.
Azeem believes Cambridge can develop more inclusionary housing by levying taxes. He referred to places such as Jersey City, New Jersey, and Somerville, which have levied taxes and fees to build this type of below-market rate housing.
Central Square rezoning
Creating zoning that would allow substantial multiunit buildings on city-owned lots in Central Square was advanced by several candidates. McGovern said if the city built housing units on these lots, heโd prefer those sites be fully affordable. He said, though, the city would have to look closely at private development if a mix of market-rate and affordable units created more affordable units overall.
The idea of 18-story buildings in Central Square was one Wilson said she wasnโt โ100 percent sureโ about. Sheโd like more community input on development before moving forward.
Siddiqui said the city needs to โreally think about fundingโ development of those Central Square lots. The city should be working with developers on how we can help them build feasibly, she said.
The lone voice against multifamily development in the cityโs core was Zusy, who was also the only councillor to vote against multifamily housing reform. She said she voted against the measure because it wouldโve incentivized development within parts of the city that are outside recommendations in Envision Cambridge, a wide-ranging plan for the city to achieve several goals by 2030. The plan called for more development of units along the cityโs major traffic corridors, in its squares and in the transitional districts between squares and residential neighborhoods.
โThere are different ways to build more housing than a multifamily ordinance,โ she said.
Tenant protections
Several candidates focused on better conditions for Cambridgeโs substantial rental community. Ayah Al-Zubi, who is making another bid for a council seat, is pushing for more proposals that would protect tenants, including rent control and emergency assistance for renters struggling with addiction.
For Al-Zubi, the issue is personal โ she said she has moved at least five times in the seven years that she has lived in the city due to rising rents, bad landlords or both. Last year, Al-Zubi said her landlord didnโt provide her building with heating or cooling.
โMy story is not a unique story,โ she said. โThere are other people who are living in situations where they feel like they are not heard, and their landlords are taking advantage of that.โ
She also supports building more social housing for people with low and middle incomes, and would like the city to develop a new homeless shelter.
Bullister shared several ideas on ways to lower the cost of rent, including giving renters more negotiating power.
โI think that policy and zoning are all about giving people choices and opening doors to the possibility that they can live affordably, they can live sustainably if they want, and not force them to live in a giant place if they really don’t want to,โ she said.
Just whatโs affordable?
Councillor Patty Nolan said people need an adequate income to afford housing costs, and what was needed was โa living wage for โฆ the people overall.โ Nolan said she would call on the city council to reexamine its job-training program to ensure it is working effectively.
Challenger Stanislav Rivkin called on the city to create โdeeplyโ affordable housing. These are buildings that offer units to people earning below 50 percent of the area’s median income โ about $56,300 in Cambridge. He said a mix of social housing, community land trusts and housing vouchers might make that possible.
In her questionnaire, write-in candidate Louise Venden said that her priorities for square and corridor rezoning are to identify the ones that are most likely to attract affordable- and middle-market-rate developers. To do so, she said, โWhat we need to do is figure out what people need, and then figure out where those most likely places are to provide the amenities and conveniences, the transportation, the infrastructure, including water and sewer, and all of those things, and open space.โ




Thanks for this write-up.
Here is a bugaboo I have:
We pay city council members $50k per year (I think not positive). Members like Wilson are just not worth the money we pay them. Why is she on the council? What is she for? There has been a yearslong effort on central square rezoning with tons of community input (https://www.cambridgema.gov/Departments/communitydevelopment/centralsquarerezoning) and the best you have to say is that we need more inputโฆ
You can be against 18 story buildings. Thatโs fine. Say so. Then at least we know what we are electing. Useless!
Cambridge urgently needs bold, practical steps to expand affordable housing. Itโs encouraging that candidates are discussing social housing, zoning reform, and tenant protections. Leveraging the cityโs strong bond rating and trust funds to build affordable, sustainable homes would help keep Cambridge livable.
Without action, Cambridge risks becoming an enclave for the wealthy. We must preserve its character as a diverse, inclusive community.
For those of you following at home, here’s a quick takeaway:
BURHAN AZEEM WANTS TO RAISE YOUR TAXES!
Donโt let luxury homeowners tell you zoning reform is bad. They want nothing to change in their comfortable world and donโt care what you pay in rent.
Here is a beautiful story about someone lifted out of homeless by the Affordable Housing Overlay.
https://cambridge-housing.org/home-at-last-christina-mumms-journey-to-norfolk-street/
When you vote, keep in mind that candidates endorsed by A Better Cambridge made this happen.
https://www.abciepac.org/2025-candidates
Unlike Doug Brown, I’m quite willing to pay more in property taxes if the increased funds would be dedicated to building more housing for low and moderate income families. Cambridge has the 1st or 2nd lowest tax rate in Massachusetts and though the assessed values are very high the residential exemptions reduces the taxable amount by a considerable amount. We are not currently over taxed.