Despite legal protections, few who use Section 8 find small landlords who will rent them homes

The 929 Apartments at 929 Massachusetts Ave., Mid-Cambridge, is one of a few large developments that rent to people using Section 8 rent vouchers. (Photo: Google)
For the first time in recent years, a majority of low-income Cambridge tenants with Section 8 rent vouchers are finding a place to rent in Cambridge. Still, relatively few are leasing from small landlords here, underlining the city’s housing divide when it comes to income.
Michael Johnston, executive director of the Cambridge Housing Authority, which administers the federal rent assistance program, pointed out the trend last month at a meeting of the CHA board and described it to the City Council’s Housing Committee. Only 221 of the 1,239 Section 8 units in Cambridge, or 18 percent, are being rented from “small mom-and-pop-type landlords,” Johnston said in an email.
The remainder of Section 8 units are in buildings owned by affordable housing developers, luxury housing that is required to include some lower-rent apartments and a few large developments such as the 929 Apartments at 929 Massachusetts Ave., Mid-Cambridge, and Walden Park at 205 Walden St., Neighborhood 9, Johnston said. Those sites have U.S. Department of of Housing and Urban Development contracts to rent some apartments to Section 8 tenants.
Douglas Quattrochi, executive director of MassLandlords, a nonprofit organization representing and educating landlords, said it’s “sadly not surprising” that few small landlords rent to Section 8 tenants. Although state law prohibits discriminating against applicants because they get government aid, landlords can “always take a better qualified or faster applicant,” Quattrochi said.
“The Section 8 program is not competitive with market applicants, especially in Cambridge,” he said. “Consider the typical university-affiliated, highly educated and compensated market applicant in Cambridge compared with a Section 8 applicant who, however well prepared, still might have to wait two months for their case worker to do the paperwork to lease up. The landlord will rent that apartment to the market applicant every time.”
The need for inspections before owners can participate in the Section 8 program can also cause “major delays,” he said.
Quattrochi also said many landlords don’t know they can’t reject applicants solely because they get Section 8, and there is little enforcement. MassLandlords has tried to educate landlords on the law, he said.
Dollar limits
Section 8 is a federal program that helps low-income tenants find housing in the private market. Tenants pay roughly 30 percent of their income toward rent and the government pays the rest, up to a limit.
That limit, set by Housing and Urban Development agency, can keep tenants from finding housing in a high-rent city such as Cambridge, because some landlords won’t accept below-market rents. CHA has won the right to set higher rents than the federal agency allows, but more and more Section 8 certificate holders have sought housing outside the city since the early 2000s.
Cambridge, Boston and housing authorities in several neighboring communities won a 26 percent increase in Section 8 rent caps in 2019. Cambridge also adopted a method of setting rent limits by ZIP code in an effort to open up more neighborhoods to Section 8 tenants. Results haven’t been reported.
Now, 54 percent of Section 8 tenants overseen by the authority are renting in the city, Johnston said. Yet more than a third of them are living in buildings owned by affordable housing developments, sites that are filled by other low-income residents. Those in inclusionary units – apartments that luxury housing developers must set aside for lower-income tenants – make up another one-third-plus, and tenants in the small number of older large buildings with HUD contracts constitute about 10 percent, according to Johnston.
Cry me a river. “Mom and pops” are under ZERO obligation.
These are the people who for years have taken the financial risks and responsibilities with their properties only now to already be put upon with requirements really meant for big box developers. Need to cut a tree on your property which you actually planted many years ago? Whoaaaaa not so fast….the city of Cambridge has an opinion about that…..and meanwhile they cut down their own trees?
Why would a small landlord give up the flexibility of controlling their own property when, as the article states, there’s plenty of qualified renters that come without the excess baggage?
Shameful that small landlords would illegally discriminate against voucher holders, and we need better enforcement. But as the article and comment above suggest, the biggest problem is competition – too many renters chasing too few apartments.
If we built enough multi-family rental housing, and landlords were forced to compete for tenants rather than the other way around, the power dynamic would be in a much better place.
It frustrates me when people say that more “luxury housing” doesn’t help low-income renters. It clearly does, both directly (as the article notes, many of these larger developments are much less discriminatory to voucher holders) and indirectly (through increasing competition).
A landlord doesn’t need to illegally discriminate to avoid renting to S8 renters. All they usually need to do is have strict rental requirements, looking at credit scores, rental history & eviction history, and job history & income requirements. Also, the fact that S8 has time consuming inspections, won’t support month-to-month leases, and won’t use anything but their own lease agreements means that S8 renters are at a significant disadvantage relative to others looking for a place to live.
It’s not discrimination, it’s just unfortunate circumstances for the section 8 renters. If you were selling something on eBay, would you sell to someone who pays you instantaneously by Venmo, or for the same price, sell it to someone who says they will send a friend to take a look and then send you a check? It’s simple as that.
It does indeed look that the problem is more a matter of the process hoops involved in accepting a section 8 voucher. Small landlords can’t afford to leave their property unoccupied for the inspection process etc.
In renting, Time=Money. I’m not a landlord, but I can understand the problem involved.