
In a rare upset for an incumbent state representative, Marjorie Decker was defeated Tuesday in a Democratic primary that would have likely sealed up her return to Beacon Hill for a seventh term, according to unofficial results from a Cambridge Election Commission count.ย
Update on Sept. 4, 2024: Upon beginning a count of provisional ballots Wednesday, a batch of hand counts had Decker ahead by 42, which means she would keep her seat.
Instead, challenger Evan MacKay, a Harvard educator and labor organizer, is all but certain to represent the 25th Middlesex District in the state Legislature; there is no identified opponent in the November general election.
MacKay had 3,354 votes cast to Deckerโs 3,314, according to the commission, or 50.2 percent to Deckerโs 49.7 percent. Provisional votes are to be counted Wednesday, but the current 40-vote difference doesnโt put the election within automatic recount range, but one can be requested, commissioner chair Ethridge King said โ and Decker โis a fighter.โ
There are a little over 300 overseas, absentee and provisional ballots to be counted, but no one among the staff or politics watchers who stayed to the end of Tuesdayโs count โ begun at 8:30 p.m. and lasting until around 1 a.m. โ said there was much reason to believe the balance of votes would tilt back decisively in Deckerโs favor. There was also no post from the campaign or report of a concession or a challenge. The Decker campaign held a two-hour party at the Fresh Pond Beer Garden that The Harvard Crimson reported ended โwith Decker and her supporters dancing and appearing to celebrate.โ Decker campaign manager Ryan Telingator pointed to the votes remaining to be counted, the Crimson said.
The MacKay campaign, at a party at 730 Tavern in Central Square not far from the Citywide Senior Center, was exulting in victory at around 10:15 p.m. based on precinct reports while a formal count dragged on.
โThis was a campaign where some of us from the very beginning had a belief in the impossible,โ MacKay told a cheering crowd of supporters. โWe showed that a grassroots movement can take on the might of the political establishment and we can win.โ
Considering how hard it is to unseat an incumbent, โthe margin of this election is a mandate,โ MacKay said.
Decker has held the seat since the fall of 2012, after the retirement of mentor Alice Wolf. No one running against Decker since had achieved more than 14.5 percent of the districtโs vote since 2014, and MacKay was her first challenger since 2018.

Left-leaning candidates
MacKay drew in younger voters via social media platforms where the incumbentโs campaign was absent, and it became clear in recent weeks that Decker was sweating this election: campaign material was dropped off on doorsteps almost daily, and volunteer calls, automated texts and robocalls came frequently. (On primary day, a half-dozen texts and at least three calls.) The MacKay campaign had been asking for a debate since April; a forum took place only five days ago because of Decker campaign delay, MacKay campaign manager Lee Folpe said.
In some ways, the election was a replay of the 1998 election of Jarrett Barrios, another young Harvardian who defeated an incumbent โ Alvin Thompson โ who had five terms in the House. Barrios also delivered new, younger voters to the polls on a platform that was less further to the left. Barrios is gay; MacKay identifies as nonbinary.
Folpe said the idea that drove the campaign was to โbring people into the movement โ not just electing a candidate, but really building political consciousness and solidarity.โ
This primary also saw a win for state Rep. Erika Uyterhoeven in Somervilleโs 27th Middlesex District, according to unofficial results posted by that cityโs Election Commission. She faced a challenge from Kathleen Hornby, a former aide to Decker, and the Democratic City Committee endorsed Hornby over the incumbent with some in Somerville saying Uyterhoeven was too far to the left to be effective legislator.
Yet she beat Hornby with 69 percent of the votes cast in that race: 5,705 to 2,571.
โItโs the bold, progressive policies and being more visionary and ambitious about what is possible in our state. Changing the how the state house works is very important to my district,โ Uyterhoeven said. โAnd now we have the receipts to prove it again.โ
Campaign issues
Resistance by Decker to adding hours to โRiverbend Parkโ by closing Memorial Drive to car traffic on Saturdays resonated with many, as well as Deckerโs lack of engagement with Riverbend supporters and being shown by state documents to be advocating against it while presenting herself as neutral. The MacKay campaignโs issues of affordable housing, progressive taxation of the wealthy and government transparency benefited from Deckerโs repeated votes against making legislatorsโ committee votes public and revelations from public financial disclosure records โ namely that Decker had been adding to her $114,447 state salary with work for the Boston class-action law firm Berman Tabacco from 2016 to 2023. Her pay is listed only as being more than $100,001, the highest tier on the forms. The Boston Globe gave MacKay front-page coverage, saying that previous election years had brought โlittle substantive competition.โ
At the August forum, Decker acknowledged that committee votes are โpublic but not accessibleโ and that she is working to improve transparency and โcertainly has nothing to hide,โ while saying that as a 14-year incumbent she shared the publicโs frustration around State House dysfunction and has โworked to change it.โย
The pace of change wasnโt fast enough for MacKay voters, who had been opening doors to campaign volunteers since December under Folpeโs leadership.
โWe came into this campaign with the idea of getting people to engage in state politics, somethingย a lot of people don’t pay any attention to whatsoever, and getting them to recognize the effect that it has on their daily lives and the ways they can be instrumental in changing the status quo,โ Folpe said.
Campaign social media manager Clyve Lawrence delivered a big boost with communication and by turning online engagement into voters, Folpe said. โReddit was really instrumental. It was great to do the [Ask Me Anything], because I think it allowed people to engage really directly with Evan and to have the questions answered in real time. It got a lot of people interested in the race, and I think we noticed that people were engaging on Reddit and bringing that into the real world as well โ we would have people on the doors ask us about things that had only been discussed on Reddit.โ
โWe had maybe too much Reddit posting,โ Folpe said, laughing.ย



Good. Maybe she shouldn’t have effed around with Riverbend park. Karma is lovely.
Decker was an incumbent immersed in the opaque state house political machine with the backing of the political class and the brahmin. McKay won with a shoe string campaign prioritizing face to face interactions with actual residents and accountability in government. That is a mandate for change.
Good news for people who like parks, housing, and safer streets as well as basic honesty in government. Don’t forget, Decker lied, the park died.
I do not understand how 300+ uncounted votes won’t change his 40 vote lead. How is that correct?
“Barrios is gay; MacKay identifies as nonbinary.”
Why only “identifies as” do you contest that identification? why can’t you say “MacKay is nonbinary”?
looks like queerphobic editorial standards.
An anecdote: at Baldwin in the morning, the Decker sign holders were mostly IBEW people who took a van in from elsewhere, and they focused on waving signs at passing cars. A fine tactic, but not in this particular situation or location. But how were they to know that?
Meanwhile I was standing there in my own neighborhood with a MacKay sign, starting conversations with passing people. I actually convinced one or two people to vote for MacKay.
Just a single anecdote, but this repeated across the whole campaign: Decker had a massive political machine backing her, but over the years she has lost touch with much of the city she’s supposed to represent. Even worse, she has no interest in having conversations to change this.
“I do not understand how 300+ uncounted votes wonโt change his 40 vote lead. How is that correct?”
Statistically speaking, IF the 300 votes are completely independent of each other and if the chance of each one voting for one or the other candidate is 50-50, then it turns out there is a 1.2% probability that 130 or fewer of the votes go to MacKay (and 170 or more to Decker) thus changing the results.
However, there is a good chance the votes are NOT independent of each other. Knowing nothing about them, it seems quite possible that overseas and absentee ballots would be more likely to go to one candidate over the other (e.g. to Decker if MacKay is primarily known through local door-to-door campaigning and word of mouth).
On the other hand, it is possible a lot of those ballots are blank — people do not always vote if they don’t know the candidates.
So who knows? It isn’t over until every ballot is counted (and possibly after a recount, but those rarely change results by more than 5-10 votes).
Seems like the headline should be changed a bit more than just “Updated” if the race looks like it’s going to flip.
New article posted: https://www.cambridgeday.com/2024/09/04/incumbent-rep-marjorie-decker-keeps-her-seat-with-hand-count-of-ballots-from-state-primary/