Attempt to separate traffic enforcement topics stops with concern it ‘erases’ removal of guns

A police watch over roadwork in North Cambridge on Nov. 8. (Photo: Marc Levy)
Two traffic and police issues were put on hold Monday after the removal of a request to look into trying unarmed traffic stops.
The call by city councillor Burhan Azeem made its first appearance a week ago among a slew of other police reform issues stemming from the Jan. 4 police killing of Arif Sayed Faisal in Cambridgeport and a fatal traffic stop in Memphis, Tennessee – that of Tyre Nichols, dead Jan. 10 after an attack by officers three days earlier.
The Feb. 6 order called for removing guns from traffic enforcement through “the implementation of automatic enforcement and unarmed” officers, but councillor Paul Toner used his “charter right” to stop conversation about it until Monday, when he proposed a version that removed references to guns and violence. “I’m trying to get to yes” on exploring automated ticketing, Toner said, “and there’s some pretty strong language in here that, if we’re talking about automatic traffic enforcement, I’d like us to just vote on automatic traffic enforcement.”
“I wanted to separate them so we could deal with both issues separately,” Toner said, later explaining that he had “submitted a separate new policy order for a serious discussion about police details.”
Other councillors supported separating the issues. It was suggested that having more clarity around automated enforcement would help Cambridge become one of 10 communities to test ticketing systems being proposed by state Rep. Steve Owens and state Sen. Will Brownsberger. A policy order Monday supporting those bills passed unanimously.
Toner’s late order around police details, however, didn’t address armed traffic enforcement. Police also make a distinction between traffic enforcement and police details, which involve off-duty officers watching over safety at construction sites or with private companies needing security. Those are paid privately, not by taxpayers, while the Cambridge Police Department has a taxpayer-funded 20-person Traffic Enforcement Unit that is part of its uniformed patrol division.
“This amendment is not so benign,” councillor Quinton Zondervan told Toner. “It doesn’t just split the issues, it also erases that concern about having armed police officers interacting with with drivers pulled over in traffic.”
Though he agreed with having two orders that let automated ticket be voted on alone, “if you do that, then you still need to capture the other issues that are being raised. And these amendments don’t do that,” Zondervan said.
Azeem suggested tabling his own order for a week so he could work with Toner, and all nine councillors approved the motion.
When Toner’s late order about police details was brought forward next, exploring such issues as whether there’s a community-safety benefit to sworn police officers working details and the pros and cons of them being armed, Zondervan used his charter right to end discussion.
This month was the council’s third try at talking about unarmed traffic stops after a July 27, 2020, order was paused over legal concerns and one Sept. 14, 2020, went no further than a Public Safety Committee hearing.
Like the latest, they have been inspired by black and brown driver deaths at the hands of police claiming a moving violation. Data from the Los Angeles-based nonprofit Mapping Police Violence from mid-April 2022 cited in The Guardian showed police nationwide killed nearly 600 people during traffic stops since 2017, including Patrick Lyoya, 26, of Michigan, who died in April after being pulled over for a mismatched license plate; Daunte Wright, 20, stopped in Minnesota for an expired registration tag and a hanging air freshener; and Sandra Bland, 28, who died in a Texas jail after police said she failed to signal a lane change.
Riverbend Park and Riverside
Another stalled initiative Monday involved Riverbend Park, formed by closing the state’s Memorial Drive to car traffic. An order by Azeem sought to keep using the space near Harvard Square for recreation Saturdays and Sundays from the first weekend of spring until the last weekend of fall; closing Sundays only was the tradition until recently. Last year’s test of Saturday closings diverted new traffic into the Riverside neighborhood, where resident complaints have led to a tug-of-war with bicyclists, runners and other users of the open space.
“I don’t hear anyone talking about the quality of life that the residents have been enduring – the traffic, the sounds, the smells, the danger to our children,” said Sheila Headley Burwell, of Riverside, on Monday.
A charter right was invoked again, this time for Azeem’s Riverbend Park order and by councillor E. Denise Simmons, who said his he’d left her “sad and frustrated and weary” as the “lone black woman on this council” fighting for people often “carelessly, casually and dismissively brushed aside.”
Simmons told Azeem that “there were a number of people that were really put aback that you did this during Black History Month.”
Thank you councilor toner for focusing on automated enforcement.
It has been proven to drastically reduce red light running and speeding, both of which are currently huge safety issues for pedestrians in the city.
It’s not so much that Toner is focusing on automated enforcement; there were two POs on the topic, and neither were co-sponsored by Toner.
It seems more like Toner also wants police traffic enforcement, and he wants them to be armed, so he tried to amend the unarmed police part of the proposal out of existence. (He’s made sure to show his support for the police and police union in relevant conversations, e.g. in discussion of body cameras he’s noted the importance of union support for the proposal, and his confidence that recordings would show the police are doing their job well.)
As a person who walks most places — we need to reign in driver behavior ASAP. Automated enforcement would go a long way to preventing interactions with the police.
I don’t know enough to dispute what you wrote.
I just want commuters to stop making my neighborhood a war zone.
Automated enforcement would be great, yes. The problem is that it requires state legislature approval, and the MA legislature is not the most responsive organization.
Another item on the agenda yesterday was putting out a statement in support of relevant legislation that has (once again) been submitted as a bill: https://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=4252&MediaPosition=&ID=18296&CssClass=
Itamar: I supported all of the recent policy orders with my votes. As you know we can’t all be sponsors, no more than 4 at a time can be sponsors due to the public meeting law. On this particular PO I held it for a week and offered to separate the two issues: automatic traffic enforcement versus the issue of police details. One has nothing to do with the other. As for police details I offered a second policy order listing a series of questions about details, who works them, asking about state law, collective bargaining, etc. all questions we should get answered before we attempt to make set policy. Unfortunately, a lot of these policy orders and the “whereas” statements are more virtue signaling than based on facts.
And yes, I support Commissioner Elow, the DA and our police department as they do their investigation. I have many friends and family members who are police officers and firefighters and I believe they do their jobs honorably and with the intention of serving the public and interests of safety. If through the investigation it is determined that the officers involved did something that was improper or illegal in responding to this tragic incident I will be the first calling for appropriate disciplinary measures.
Although I don’t mind exploring this idea, I do have some doubts. People do carry guns in their cars sometimes (legally or illegally). I don’t like that but it is the reality that we ask our police officers to deal with.
I guess my real question is one of focus (and I suspect this underpins some of the other responses). The council’s time and attention is finite. Is this really the most important topic to focus on when it comes to traffic enforcement? I have not heard of any traffic stops turning into police shootings here in Cambridge. I know this is brought up again in response to S Faisal’s shooting but he jumped out of a window with a knife. It wasn’t a traffic stop.
On the other hand, dangerous driving and bike/ pedestrian injuries and deaths are actually acute issues. Shouldn’t we focus on how to increase traffic enforcement (automated or in person)?