I recently had the opportunity to experience the Tesla full self-driving beta in Cambridge, and it confirmed my intuition that the technology is not safe.

I have a deep and abiding faith in Cambridge voters that they will choose continued progress toward justice and stand against bigotry, hate and inequity. Cambridge is an amazing community and deserves to be governed by a diverse representation of its people.

Seventeen crash reports in October underscore the importance of continuing to make critical safety improvements to Cambridge roads without delay.

A recent update from the Water Department on contamination in our water supply raises grave concerns for our health and safety. The city has repeatedly refused to switch our supply to the MWRA system based on unfounded claims it would be more expensive.

The high rate of vehicle-on-bicycle crashes is extremely concerning, and it seems inevitable that more serious injury or deaths will occur if this pattern continues.

Cambridge’s tale of two cities is widely documented. But it has failed to make any meaningful effort at racial equity, and that has to change.

These unprecedented times have laid bare the fault lines of injustice, but It isn’t too late for the city, Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to come together in an unprecedented way and serve as equalizers and truly lead our response to this crisis.

The past two years have been a small taste of what a determined minority can accomplish on the council to create more equity. To make durable change, the voters need to elect a majority that will prioritize equity and stand up for communities, not developers.

This legislative efforts of Naiop, the Commercial Real Estate Development Association of Massachusetts, are a case study in how commercial interests influence politics in Cambridge, councillor Quinton Zondervan says.

The council’s procedural move effectively precludes the City of Cambridge from considering any climate protection action in the petition through zoning amendments for the next two years. Now, even the most popular ideas would be at risk of a legal challenge if implemented.