Reknitting the fabric of East Cambridge
When my wife and I came to this country with two suitcases 13 years ago, we quickly fell in love with Cambridge. Although our ardor slumps like a grizzled slush-bank at this time of year we know we were right to get hitched to this city and bring up our family here.
For our first two years we rented a small apartment in Harvard Square, where our neighbors were mostly too preoccupied to talk to us and to each other. Eleven years ago we moved to East Cambridge, and our “life” in this city really started. With a young baby and one on the way we quickly came to know all the people living on our Sixth Street block, some of whom were the second or third generation of families born in the same house; some newcomers like us; some students; and some who had chosen East Cambridge as the perfect place to retire. We were immediately made to feel at home.
After a few short months Mike, my new friend across the street, turned me on to the East Cambridge Planning Team; as if imparting some well-kept secret, “just give it a try” he said, “I know you’ll like it.” I rolled up at East End House one Wednesday evening soon afterward and descended the stairs to a slightly grubby basement room, emitting a crunchy buzz of animated talk and cookie munching. At the chairs and tables arranged in a big square I found a group of neighbors ranging from 6 to 90 years old, presided over by a lady deeply absorbed by her knitting. The atmosphere was lively, there was work to be done; these people clearly meant business.
Since that evening I have been drawn deeper and deeper into the belly of the ECPT, becoming its vice president, and becoming addicted to early morning and late-at-night e-mails, the weekend board meetings, the two Wednesday evening meetings a month and the proliferation of working groups on projects as diverse as the Gold Star Mother’s Park renovation, Lechmere Square Public Market, Broad Canal boardwalk, Lopez Avenue Community Gardens, Kendall Square master plan and Sullivan Courthouse Redevelopment.
The one thing that ties all this work together is the dedicated group of neighbors in East Cambridge I met that first night. This is a group of people who look out for each other, welcome newcomers, try to make change work positively for the community and above all want to repair the damage left by the generational retreat of industry that left our neighborhood surrounded by surface parking lots and post-industrial brownfields from Kendall Square to North Point.
Kendall Square
Over the past two years I have been lucky enough to be part of the Planning Team’s Kendall Square working group, in which we tried something new: Rather than wait and react to other people’s plans we decided to hire our own urban design consultants, CBT Architects of Boston, to help us develop a vision for Kendall Square that would give the neighborhood a clear, organized voice in the city’s master planning process for this part of the city. Many dozens of us attended scores of meetings over that time to educate ourselves, refine our vision and communicate it to anyone who would listen. We developed a neighborhood vision that was not knee-jerk resistance to change, but rather one that sought to harness change to bring “More Homes, Parks and Stores to Kendall”; that was our motto, and it made a pretty cool T-shirt.
Inspired by this process, I can now see the huge influx of research dollars and commercial development as an opportunity for Kendall to reinvent itself as a part of the city on a par with Harvard and Porter squares, a place where people will live, work, play and study all within walking distance, a place where people will want to come and visit – a cool place.
In the two short years since we convened our working group for the first time, Third Street has already taken off with new restaurants, cafes, stores and homes, and now, with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology zoning proposal, the area around Main Street can take off too. You probably know it as the place where the line of flags and brick sidewalk is about the most exciting thing happening right now, but the proposal will bring almost 70,000 square feet of stores, hundreds of homes, a series of public open spaces and close to $10 million in city taxes each year. It will also finally give Kendall Square a “heart,” where MIT and the city will mingle in a way that has never happened before.
This area of a few city blocks is arguably one of the most innovative places on the planet, but could be more so. At the moment it feels decidedly lackluster, with a whiff of suburbia. I do hope the decision-makers in the city seize this opportunity to change that and embrace the MIT plan.
A new East Cambridge
I see a bright future for East Cambridge. Persuading people to think beyond the narrow confines of profit versus resistance is the way to re-knit the city with great public open space, active streets and locally owned small-scale retail.
NorthPoint came with 10 acres of new parks; the Alexandria development with nearly 3 acres of parks and a redesigned and pedestrian friendly Binney Street. A re-knitted East Cambridge, where the old live-work neighborhood of factories and densely packed houses is reinterpreted with centers of life science research and new condominiums and apartments, is something worth working for.
This new East Cambridge will be in many ways just the same as it has always been: welcoming to people who have just arrived in the country, convenient for those that want to work or study all the hours of the day and night, a good place to bring up a family. For my family it is home, and we love it.
Chris Matthews is vice president of the East Cambridge Planning Team, a landscape architect and lives on Sixth Street.
Thank you, Chris, for your thoughtful essay and your deep commitment to our community.
I agree that our thinking about the MIT upzoning proposal ought to go “beyond the narrow confines of profit verses resistance,” as you have suggested.
But by the same token, I believe that the revitalization of Kendall Square is not contingent upon the city council’s immediate approval of the current plan to build large corporate towers on MIT’s East Campus.
When we hear about MIT’s vision for Kendall Square, a heavy emphasis is placed on the kinds of things that most people would welcome, such as connected open spaces, a commitment to innovation space, and new retail options, etc.
But what’s missing is a commitment from the Institute to provide additional housing options for graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and some members of the junior faculty.
Presently, MIT is asking the city council to approve the current plan for on-campus commercial development — and then they are promising to deliver a report on graduate student housing later this summer.
I join with current MIT professor and former Massachusetts Secretary of Transportation Fred Salvucci and others in calling for the city council to let the current petition expire so that we can continue to work with MIT to strike an agreement over the need for additional graduate student housing. The petition could simply be refiled and our discussion can continue into the summer.
The importance of the graduate student housing piece cannot be underestimated. It represents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for our city to effectively recover a large stock of not-so-expensive rental housing, including many units that would otherwise be suitable for families.
In sum, we can all agree on benefits of a revitalized Kendall Square, but there’s no need for our city council to transfer additional commercial real estate rights to the MIT Investment Management Company until the Institute comes forward with a plan for additional graduate student housing.
Its always refreshing to hear the comments from people who are actually engaged and working towards the future of an area he knows and loves.
I couldn’t agree more Chris, and I thank you for writing this piece. More often than not I see the commentaries of people who’d rather work to entrench the idea that it is “us” vs. “them” usually spouting the often tiresome rhetoric of corporate greed or lashing out at perceived “establishment” commercial interests in an attempt to drum up political support or simply start a fire. I’m glad I don’t see that here.
My interest and love for Cambridge evolved much as yours has. I live in Area IV, my wife and I are expecting our first, and I got invited to a Central Square Business Association meeting about four years ago, and haven’t left. In fact, much to my wife’s dismay I’ve become even more active. I think once you get to know Cambridge, and actually live here you find that it isn’t such a narrow argument as you suggest, and that we can all contribute to the future of Cambridge without throwing stones.