Foundry ribbon-cutting gives the city a glimpse of $46 million project that opens in September
The Foundry 101 community building in East Cambridge got a ribbon-cutting Wednesday marking the end of major construction. (Photo: Tyler Motes)
While the Foundry 101 building opens to the public in September, major construction is finished and residents were allowed to walk through the first floor of the refurbished building Wednesday at a ribbon-cutting, visiting spaces within where creation will take place.
The building features a wood shop, metal shop, artist studios, a dance studio, a kitchen and a theater. Offices are also available for market and below-market rent for businesses and nonprofits, with a focus on entrepreneurship, technology and workforce education. The project is expected to “facilitate access for residents, especially underrepresented communities, to the dynamic working and learning environment of Kendall Square,” according to the event’s press release.
How the building has been renovated for new, productive use says a lot about how Cambridge has changed over the decades, officials said.
The Foundry building, at 101 Rogers St., East Cambridge, has had many uses over its 132-year history. It housed a foundry for Blake & Knowles Steam Pump, was a taxi barn in the midcentury and office space in the 1980s.
“In 1890 and 1900, over 60 percent of the population of Cambridge were immigrants or the children of immigrants,” said Charles Sullivan, executive director of the Cambridge Historical Commission. “And that’s who worked here.”
City Manager Louis A. DePasquale and Mayor Sumbul Siddiqui are surrounded by fellow officials the second after cutting the Foundry ribbon Wednesday. (Photo: Tyler Motes)
Jason Weeks, the executive director of Cambridge Arts, hopes Foundry 101 will now serve as a place for the exchange of ideas. “We talk a lot in Cambridge about the bump and mingle of innovation, and I think historically a lot of that bump and mingle happened on the sidewalk, happened at the local pub, happened at a library,” Weeks said. “But these days that bump and mingle of innovation happens inside a building: If its Google, it’s the Googlers. In this particular case, we’ve created a shared innovated space for arts and culture.”
“What we want to do is [have] a space for folks to come and explore all of the different ways that they can be creative across the performing arts, culinary arts, makerspaces, design and science and really think about how they can take all of those disparate parts of themselves and make a hole and create something out of it,” said Diana Navarrete-Rackauckas, the executive director of the Foundry Consortium.
Participants at the ribbon-cutting enter the Foundry’s atrium. (Photo: Tyler Motes)
The consortium, with leadership chosen by the Cambridge Redevelopment Authority to run day-to-day operations, plans to accept applications soon for people seeking to become the building’s first artists-in-residence, with tenures starting in January.
The building is meant to be self-sustaining, with rents covering its estimated $1.5 million to $1.6 million annual operating cost. The project cost $46 million dollars to build, with construction starting in 2019 – though officials note that’s hardly the whole story.
A spacious wood shop is among makerspaces found inside the Foundry. (Photo: Tyler Motes)
“Standing here today is a result of a community process that goes back to 2012, when the city first acquired the building,” City Manager Louis A. DePasquale said in remarks.
Other officials who spoke at the event were Mayor Sumbul Siddiqui and former city councillor Timothy Toomey – like DePasquale, strongly associated with his East Cambridge neighborhood.
DePasquale grew up in East Cambridge and sees the Foundry as a “special place.”
And as a community building, it belongs to anyone from any neighborhood, officials said.
“The whole point is to bring everybody together in this community space,” DePasquale said. “We have to continue to work to find the residents in the city who don’t fully accept and understand that this is everybody’s.”
I was disappointed at the revisionist history. I heard no mention of Alexandria Real Estate, who donated the building, not out of the goodness of their heart, of course, but in exchange for a massive upzoning, nonetheless intending that it be used for the benefit of the surrounding communities. They understood that they were asking for a lot in a community that had a history of fighting hard for responsible development and commensurate community benefits. They recognized that having the City put this building to good use would benefit everyone, including them.
Then-City Manager Bob Healy just wanted to unload it, and the City Council at the time was pretty much on board with that plan. Several things came together to change the assumptions and allow yesterday’s ribbon cutting to happen. East Cambridge resident Ilan Levy organized a heavily-attended and thoroughly delightful day of art to show what could happen in the building and then kept working behind the scenes to change officials’ minds.
When Rich Rossi became City Manager, Councillors Leland Cheung and Tim Toomey came out publicly in favor of keeping the building, and he agreed. Later on, Councillor Nadeem Mazen, who had run a profitable arts business, built support for the feasibility of using the Foundry for the arts. In addition, Longy closed its community music program, leaving a lot of local music students, many of whose families had money they were willing to spend, looking for a new home for a beloved and profitable program.
The Cambridge Redevelopment Authority was enlisted to use its specific powers to figure out how to realize the dreams of growing numbers of people. At one point, as it became clear that renovating the building was a monumental undertaking, some people started asking if we should just tear the building down and start over. At that point, lifelong East Cambridge resident Marie Saccoccio swung into action to document the important place of the Foundry in our history, including especially women’s labor history, and filed a successful landmarking petition.
Without the steadfast advocacy of these people, few of whom were acknowledged in any way at the ribbon cutting, there would have been no building to celebrate. I shouldn’t be surprised, but, once again, I am. We really owe ourselves better.