Will Cambridge live up to its reputation, investing in its largest environmental justice community?
Entering Fresh Pond Reservation, you are immersed in a forest. Walking inside, leaving traffic noise behind, jaws unclench, shoulders loosen, ears perk to songbirds and there are glimpses of chipmunks scurrying past, hooded merganser ducks floating on the water – and, if you’re lucky, a sighting of a red-tailed hawk. In a time of climate and social crisis, nature can be a source of meditation for beauty, wonder, belonging and refuge.
Is this public good shared equally and accessible for all in our communities?
As you walk the 2.5-mile loop, it becomes obvious that not many black and brown people frequent this space. This is not a surprise for us; as longtime residents who grew up in Cambridge on Rindge Avenue, we were unaware of this park’s existence until adulthood. Based on the parkgoers, it appears little has changed. This is not a coincidence, but a systemic failing that has intentionally segregated and isolated communities of color. Structural racism is nuanced, but at its core it is a simple mindset built on the foundations of communities fearing the impact of immigrants and poor families in their neighborhoods and schools beginning in the 1930s.
In a progressive city such as Cambridge, many would argue that diversity is not only important, it is one of our greatest assets. Studies have demonstrated the tangible benefits of diversity in workplaces that nurtures problem-solvers and innovative thinkers. Are we willing to break down walls and barriers to make way for a true paradigm shift that cultivates genuine diversity and inclusion in our neighborhoods, open spaces and schools?
Leaving Fresh Pond Reservation for a mile journey to reach North Cambridge, pedestrians go 20 minutes through car exhaust fumes and an unending flow of traffic. The congestion is contributed by cars accessing the Fresh Pond Mall, using the rotary and driving on Alewife Brook Parkway and Rindge Avenue, which function as on-ramps to some of the state’s most congested highways: routes 3, 16 and 2.
On this side of the neighborhood, unknown to many who pass through Rindge Avenue, is another pond.
Unlike Fresh Pond, Jerry’s Pond has been neglected for more than 60 years. In the 1890s, when Cambridge decided to build water pipelines, the lines were not extended to North Cambridge, forcing mostly Irish and French Canadian immigrants to retrieve buckets of water from Jerry’s Pond for use. Passage of the Clean Water Act of 1972 made water a human right, but the Flint, Michigan, water crisis of 2014 is clear evidence that we are not as progressive or humane in how we treat particular populations. In Cambridge, we’ve simply swapped access to water with access to natural green spaces. Yet in light of the events of the Covid pandemic, many cities have recognized how crucial access to green space is for an individual and community well-being.
The stark contrast between Fresh Pond and Jerry’s Pond demands attention. It raises questions about who and what we prioritize in our city.
Jerry’s Pond serves as the front lawn to the three 22-story Rindge Towers, Jefferson Park public housing complex and two limited-equity condominiums. On Rindge Avenue, these two blocks consist of approximately 4,000 residents, with more coming! It is the largest concentration of affordable housing in all of Cambridge – our largest environmental justice community, and the only one that fits all three census criteria of low-income, English-isolation and minority.
Unlike other revitalized neighborhoods that often experience a spike in housing costs, in this stretch of Rindge Avenue the community will preserve its existing stock of affordable housing for generations to come. An investment in Jerry’s Pond will continue to reap benefits for future Cambridge residents who, without that housing, cannot afford to remain in this city.
The complete revitalization of Jerry’s Pond presents an unusual and perhaps one-time opportunity for placemaking and neighborhood identity for the Rindge community. Genuine placemaking is a community-driven, bottom-up approach that allows members of the community to play key roles in its identity, creation and maintenance.
In the summer of 2020, life-science developer IQHQ bought Jerry’s Pond as part of a larger 27-acre site. In meetings with IQHQ, community groups Alewife Study Group and Friends of Jerry’s Pond and environmental organizations such as Green Cambridge and Mass Audubon have on repeated occasions praised IQHQ’s willingness to engage with the community – and to make iterative changes to implement community ideas including more seating areas, a Mass Audubon educational center and a community garden. The conversations the past two years have focused largely on the north side of IQHQ’s property, where three-quarters of a million square feet of labs are under construction. On the south side, which includes Jerry’s Pond along Rindge Avenue, conversations have been more sporadic.
The city has been completely absent in these discussions, other than supplying a misleading report. It seems the city is happy to sit on the sidelines even after two Neighborhood & Long-Term Planning committee meetings with presentations from Arup, an engineering firm that discusses the severe impact of climate change – principally heat discomfort and air pollution – on residents where there is a lack of tree canopy; and from a wetland scientist on the feasibility of a restoration of the pond.
We ask, are we proud of the Cambridge that we live in? Are we okay casting off thousands of residents into the margins of society, denying them a new greenway here? Have we determined that their life is worth less because of particular circumstances?
A policy order presented Monday by councillors Ayesha Wilson and Sumbul Siddiqui, who both grew up in the Rindge Avenue community, and co-sponsored by vice mayor Marc McGovern and councillor Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler, requested that the city support enhancements to IQHQ’s plan that would add more tree canopy, green infrastructure, safer and healthier pedestrian and bicycle paths, restoration of the shoreline ecology and other improvements to the current plans for the Rindge Avenue public edge along Jerry’s Pond and to investigate funding sources for such plans, including the city’s capacity.
The order did not pass, with five votes against from Mayor E. Denise Simmons and councillors Burhan Azeem, Patty Nolan, Joan Pickett and Toner and four votes in favor from the policymakers. The discussions were rooted in misinformation and demonstrated the lack of understanding by some of the councillors of the nuances of the proposal.
The intention of a policy order is for the City Council to determine, based on information as presented during the committee hearings, whether the city manager should devote city resources to understand the benefits of the project to the community.
An opposing councillor redirected the question to a deputy city manager and Department of Public Work commissioner to explain their stance, which left out potential health, climate, environment and complete-streets improvements and raised unfounded fears.
The deputy city manager brought up concerns about trucking contaminated soil to a rural community – one raised in 2021 during community discussions with IQHQ, and their response has been: “Contaminated soil will be disposed of at facilities that are permitted to accept the soils based on testing data.” If this is a genuine concern, how can IQHQ justify removing around 100,000 tons of contaminated soil to build commercial labs on the other side of the pond, but not a fraction of that amount to create a green space for a densely populated community?
An opposing councillor mentioned the roughly 100 meetings IQHQ and community groups have hosted. Unfortunately, the discussions regarding the Rindge Avenue side have been at most sporadic – no more than a small percentage of the meetings. It’s also important to acknowledge that of the organized community groups, only Friends of Jerry’s Pond includes representation from the Rindge Avenue community.
Other opposing councillors said the Rindge Avenue community needs special attention but voted against the order. The tie-breaker vote was from an opposing councillor that did not provide an explanation, but simply voted no.
The vote was a disappointment. The city of Cambridge has decided to leave implementation of its stated environmental justice goals to private developers rather than working with them and members of adjacent communities to make Rindge Avenue the best it can be. While strides have been made, the current IQHQ plan falls well short of what is possible here: It adds few trees, cuts down seven mature trees along Rindge Avenue and leaves behind much blacktop and cement that hinders the development of high quality soil, limits tree growth and ignores the benefits of green infrastructure in stormwater runoff absorption.
The revitalization of Jerry’s Pond seeks to alleviate flooding, heat and air pollution, creating a healthier neighborhood for kids and families along Rindge Avenue and the broader North Cambridge community. A recent New York Times article, “A New Era in Global Heat,” highlights why we desperately need more trees in our communities and the importance of innovative and forward-thinking city leaders.
We urge residents to write and speak with the councillors, city manager, Community Development and Public Works on why they are disappointed with the policy order decision.
The developer presents to the Conservation Commission at 7 p.m. Jan. 22. Please consider participating in public comment to show your support.
Councillors Ayesha Wilson and Sumbul Siddiqui; Benadette Manning; and Pasang Lhamo
Councillor Ayesha Wilson is a Jamaican-American social worker who has served on the Cambridge School Committee and is newly appointed to the City Council. She was raised in Jefferson Park public housing in North Cambridge by a single mother and attended Cambridge Public Schools.
Councillor Sumbul Siddiqui is a Pakistani-American Muslim lawyer and politician who served as the 77th mayor of Cambridge. She was raised in affordable housing at the Rindge Towers in North Cambridge and attended Cambridge Public Schools.
Benadette Manning is a African-American retired Boston Public Schools teacher who raised four kids as a single mother in North Cambridge. She serves on the Friends of Jerry’s Pond leadership team and Alewife Condominium Association board, a limited-equity affordable-housing cooperative in North Cambridge.
Pasang Lhamo is a Tibetan-American community organizer and graduate of Cambridge Public Schools. She serves on the Friends of Jerry’s Pond leadership team and on the Alewife Condominium Association board. She serves on the city’s Cambridge Climate Committee.
There being no pedestrian bridge to get from Rindge to Fresh Pond says a lot.
The sheer volume of acrid disgusting pollution from all the cars and raging motorists makes getting to fresh pond one of the most unpleasant experiences in the city. We don’t go anymore because it’s intolerable.
Strange to see this public politic’ing by City Councillors for an item on the City Council agenda where they had a chance not only to vote for but also to convince others to support them. Clearly there is disagreement between the local groups on this issue – Alewife and Jerry’s Pond – and even within the latter group there is no consensus with the best plan forward. If the city owned the property it would be a different matter, but it does not. And, why bring identity politics into this? If I am not mistaken Councillors Denise Simmons (African American) and Burhan Azeem (Pakistani-American) voted against this. Are the authors suggesting that these two are somehow have different backgrounds or that they are opponents of environmental equity/justice? Not a good way to begin the term.
Fresh Pond is less than a half mile, 10 minute walk, from Rindge Towers.
Danahy Park is a half mile.
So this community has more access to the largest amount of open space in the entire city.
Meanwhile the city is cutting down HUNDREDS of mature trees on city owned property for the Jefferson Park and new Rindge project adding thousands of concrete units. That will have a more of an impact on the daily lives of these residents then Jerry’s Pond.
Um… I live on Rindge and walk to Fresh Pond all the time. It’s not an ordeal to walk down the sidewalk past Whole Foods to get there. It’s true you have to veer left at the traffic circle to get to a pedestrian crossing, but it’s not some horrible burden like the authors present.
Jerry’s Pond is currently an eyesore at a prominent intersection and it will be great when it’s nicer and accessible… but what the private company is planning with their wholly owned property [with city input] should be celebrated as a win.
Let’s not forget there’s also the Alewife Brook Reservation behind the T station [easily accessible by the walking/bike path behind Jerry’s Pond]. There’s lots of public green space in this corner of Cambridge!
First, I support doing something wonderful with Jerry’s Pit, as it was known during the years I regularly swam in it as I grew up on Rindge Ave, a grandson of immigrants who also had family who lived in the towers. Despite the differences of opinion about how the Pond area should be revitalized, the common core of agreement is that it can be a bucolic asset to the immediate community. There are very strong arguments in favor of this, regardless of the make-up of the nearby communities.
Growing up on Rindge Ave, I also spent a lot of time at Fresh Pond, both in the park and the surrounding woods, and bicycling around the pond. (That was when Danehy Park was still an actual dump instead of the well-used urban oasis it now is.) I’m baffled to know how anyone could grow up in the Sherman St-to-Alewife stretch of Rindge Ave and not know about Fresh Pond until they were adults.
I’m even more baffled to understand how Fresh Pond being unknown to the writers in their youth is evidence of systemic racism. I guess when you feel like a hammer, everything looks like a nail, and when you feel like a nail, everything looks like a hammer.
Peace Be Unto You
I’m not a native son of Cambridge,I’ve only been residing here for approximately 23 years. So I don’t really know how the good old boys and girls and their students been hashing out environmental care of the related area. Can so one tell me what type of aquatic life live in Jerry’s Pond? Are there any species of fish there,etc., was swimming allowed there once upon a time. From the way the people are talking about it, it seems as though a serious environmental crime has been left in existence by generational powers that were
and still do be. Why hasn’t the Cambridge Urban Renewal people taken this matter under their umbrella. There is so much good about the area, but also so much existing neglect. That is the crime.
Yours In Peace
Hasson Rashid
Corresponding Secretary
Alliance of Cambridge Tenants (ACT)
Cambridge,MA
All parties may well be proceeding without a good-enough understanding of the risks associated with Jerry’s Pond. My understanding from past articles (and I may be wrong) is that previous and current owners have not allowed testing of the soils along the banks, the sediments under the pond, or the water itself. Perhaps they have tested, but not shared the results.
Given North Cambridge’s industrial past, there could well be serious pollutants such as industrial chemicals and asbestos in those areas. Sadly, Jerry’s Pond may be closer to being a Superfund site than a public amenity. Again, I am more than happy to be proven wrong, but the process should be informed by data on the environmental risks.
HRASHID,
I don’t know what’s in the water of Jerry’s Pond now, but in past times, there were at least sunfish (we called them kibbies) and eels. There were (and probably still are) other types of fish, but I never knew anyone to catch anything other than the two mentioned.
If you search on Jerry’s Pond or Jerry’s Pit, you’ll find the historical information you’re asking about.
When swimming was allowed, prior to the opening of the swimming pool in the early ’60s, there was a sandy beach and a large, open-roofed “beach house” with separate sections for males and females where you could change clothes. The swimming area was defined by a chain-link fence in the water that closed off access to most of the Pit, but still left enough open water for people to enjoy.
More adventurous teens used to escape the enclosed swimming area by having a buddy hold up the bottom of the fence as they swam under it. Since all this happened underwater, it was a tricky exercise. Parents dissuaded us youngsters by retelling stories of swimmers who were trapped under the water when the fence slipped out of their accomplices’ hands and skewered them to the pond floor. (I vaguely recall only one drowning, and that occurred in the authorized swimming part.)
Incidentally, Rindge Towers are built on land that was a separate pond then. We were cautioned never to mess around that pond because “it’s bottomless, and you’ll wind up in China if you fall in.”