
Local musicians joined the conversation on a planned 25-story housing redevelopment in Davis Square on Wednesday to explain how closing The Burren temporarily for construction would hurt the arts community. Uncertainty about the future of the Irish bar, which is known for its nightly live music, adds to the tension between the need for more housing and worries that the residential tower will detract from the quality of the Square.
Developer Copper Mill has said that, unlike in earlier iterations of the project, The Burren will not be able to stay open during an estimated two years of construction. The work will renovate retail and build housing overhead on what is now a row of single-storyย structures on Elm Street from The Burren down to Dragon Pizza on Grove Street.
At a community meeting, Copper Mill chief executive Andrew Flynn said the company is in talks with The Burren and Dragon Pizza to reopen after construction with the same rental price.
The McKinnonโs Meat Market grocery store, Kung Fu Tea and restaurant Martsa on Elm have declined to return if the project moves forward. Instead, the developer plans to additionally lease to a bicycle bar, a butcher shop, a wine bar and a bookstore, though plans are in flux.
Musicians said a temporary closing of The Burren would deal a serious blow, even as its owners open another Irish bar, McCarthy’s, a half-mile away in Porter Square.

โHow do you expect us to be able to afford rent if we are supposed to sit on our hands for two years when there is no safety net for freelance musicians?โ one meeting attendee said.ย
Though McCarthyโs โ a two-story business with a small music club and bar, Toad, attached โ has yet to open atย 1920 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, about a half-mile from The Burren, musicians said it wouldnโt make up for The Burren closing. Questions about an opening date and whether McCarthyโs and Toad can pick up where The Burren leaves off were directed at co-owner Tommy McCarthy in voicemails, but he has not responded.
Some at the Wednesday meeting said the developer should consider paying musicians for missed wages should the project move forward.
Distrust

Other residents who donโt depend on The Burren for income are also worried.
โIf I had to pick one thing thatโs the anchor of Davis, it would be The Burren,โ said Nick Mellis, an urban planner and Davis Square resident, after the meeting.
Carla DeLellis, who owns four storefronts in Davis Square and ran the now-closed Johnny Dโs restaurant and music club, pointed out that there is no guarantee of The Burrenโs return.
โA developer is going to tell you everything you want to hear. But the reality is, who knows what happens two years down the road?โ DeLellis said. โTaking away The Burren is going to have future repercussions. Those businesses should not be put at risk for not returning.โ
Regardless of the project moving forward, The Burrenโs lease expires in August, which Flynn described as a โcatalyst for discussion.โ He referred to code compliance costs as being inhibitive for other vendors to take up the storefronts on that stretch, leading to the possibility of the building being โwound down anywayโ over the next few years if the redevelopment doesnโt happen.
The structures are now more than a century old, according the city assessorโs database. The stretch of storefronts went up in 1920.ย
Need for housing

Some residents called a proposed 500-unit, 25-story building a โmonstrosityโ that would stand out too much in a square of mostly one- to three-story buildings. To others, the residential tower would provide much-needed housing to Somerville without affecting more lots and businesses.
As proposed, it would provide 400 market-rate units โ which some housing economists say will help lower area rents โ as well as 100 inclusionary units below market rate, in line with Somervilleโs requirements. Somerville lists increasing housing supply and modernization of units as strategies to mitigate a housing crisis, according to the citywide plan SomerVision 2040. Residents made frequent comparisons to Prospect Union Square, a recently built 450-unit, 25-story building in another part of the city that had primarily lower-slung structures.
The development would also be near the Davis Square red line station, which supporters say is a perfect location to build a residential tower. Encouraging โtransit-oriented developmentโ has been one of Massachusettsโ policy strategies for addressing housing, transportation and climate issues.
โA one-story building in Davis Square, a transit hub, is just not a good use of our land,โ councilor at-large Jake Wilson said. โHow do we make sure weโre using our land without ruining the fabric of the community?โ
The city is not yet formally involved in the process, though several councilors attended the meeting, and Tom Galligani, the cityโs director of economic development, emphasized that his department will provide strategies to โfigure out how we get to where we want to go.โ
โRubikโs cubeโ of interests
Reconciling the interests of pro-housing residents, musicians and neighbors worried about the buildingโs height has proven to be a โRubikโs cube,โ in Flynnโs words.
Flynn insists that 500 is the โinflection pointโ of units to accommodate union construction labor, inclusionary homes and the two retail storefronts to be provided at no charge to the city for its use, all of which drive up the costs of construction โ though his claim was met with skepticism. In an interview, Flynn committed to bringing more justification for the necessity of 500 units to the next community meeting.
In the meantime, some residents involved in the Davis Square Neighborhood Council, which has taken public notes on these meetings, say they donโt want fears around The Burren to shut down the project. (The council is in its early stages and is not yet formally recognized by the city.)
โWe now hear the voice of the musicians,โ resident Zev Pogrebin said. โTheyโre stakeholders in the project and they deserve, as part of our community, to get recognized and get something out of this. But just killing the project is selfish to all other stakeholders in the community. There needs to be participation from all sides to get what they need.โ
โMusicians are some of the people who are in danger of being displaced because rents are too high,โ resident Christopher Beland said. โSo we need to find a way to get them on board.โ
โโFind another locationโ
Pogrebin and Beland advocate for finding more creative solutions around The Burren closing, such as creating temporary performance spaces or using the upcoming McCarthyโs, the bar in Porter Square that is owned by the same people who own The Burren.
Local musicians seemed doubtful of work-arounds.
โI donโt think there is a creative solution,โ Summer McCall said. โThey just need to find another location for this building.โ
McCall, who runs the Boston Celtic Music Festival, explained that her festival would suffer income losses from a two-year closing, which would affect staff, musicians, agents and event organizers.
โThereโs a lot of people who are going to fight tooth and nail to stop this from happening,โ said Calum Bell, who has played at The Burren for nine years. โTommy McCarthy is a saint and any of us would do anything for him. He does a lot for the music.โ
The project is still in its early stages, with more developer-led community meetings to follow, and construction will not begin until at least 2026. The proposed tower is not compliant with the lotโs zoning; Flynn said they want to understand the communityโs needs before proceeding with a special permit process, which will be subject to neighbor appeals.
The details for Copper Millโs next community meeting are not set. The neighborhood council has been posting meeting details ahead of time on its Facebook group.



I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve been to The Burrenโit’s a fantastic venue for live music.
That said, the proposed 25-story housing redevelopment in Davis Square is a vital opportunity to address Somerville’s severe housing shortage. Its location near a transit hub makes it an ideal spot for increased density. Adding 500 units, including 100 affordable ones, would significantly impact an area plagued by sky-high rents and limited housing options.
Would I miss The Burren? Absolutely. But housing is a higher priority.
Plus, more residents mean more customers for local businesses, especially if lower rents free up disposable income.
We can’t stall much-needed progress for the sake of a single business when so many stand to benefit.
Ms. DeLellis closed Johnny Di’s in 2016 and redeveloped it into a four story building with ground level commercial real estate and residential units above.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/music/2015/07/19/johnny-music-club-plans-close/jsp6k7PO8jh9uhtn454ZmK/story.html
https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2017/11/28/johnny-ds-former-home-in-somerville-has-been-torn-down/
https://www.thesomervilletimes.com/archives/60320
https://boston.eater.com/2015/7/20/9002661/johnny-ds-uptown-restaurant-music-club-will-shutter-next-year
https://boston.eater.com/2016/1/27/10841620/johnny-ds-restaurant-music-club-somerville
Lower rents? It is to laugh. Unless we find ourselves in a severe recession or a depression, which I think is a far higher likelihood than lower rents in any other circumstances. When and if this thing opens for business, let’s compare the median rents after six months with median rents now. If they’re higher, you guys have to shut up about the miracle of build-baby-build and never promise lower rents again. If they’re lower, I’ll acknowledge that you were right and never predict future rents again. Deal?
@Heather, the project includes 100 inclusionary units below market rate, meaning 100 families will benefit from lower rents. Youโd lose that bet.
When demand is high and supply is low, prices rise. Increasing housing supply, as experts have shown, reduces rents. This is basic economics
For more details, see this research: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10511482.2024.2418044.
Even if this development has no impact on market rate rents in the area, it would still benefit housing affordability because it would provide 100 permanently affordable homes without any public money. That being said, most research does find that building more housing improves housing affordability (see the literature review below):
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10511482.2024.2418044
I am the first to admit that building will not reduce rents in terms of nominal dollars. Median rents will almost always increase with construction: new commands a premium over old. In healthy markets, rents fall by about 1% per year of dwelling age. This breaks down in areas of under supply.
What building does is reduce rents compared to the counterfactual.
Take a look at K. Pennington’s paper “Does Building New Housing Cause Displacement?” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3867764
> rents fall by 2% for parcels within 100m of new construction. Renters’ risk of displacement to a lower-income neighborhood falls by 17%.
I’m not by any stretch a housing economist, but that’s a persuasive finding.
High rises and density do not an affordable city make. Hello everyone, New York City? Hong Kong? They are affordable housing paradises are they not? No? Oh dear, in fact they are some of the most expensive places to live.
Density increases land values which in turn tends to make the city even less affordable. You may either like those environments or not, but don’t kid yourself that continuing to build high rises is going to solve the housing crisis.
Hello, @JP. Increased density does lower rents. In addition to the studies above, the Pew Research Center analyzed four cities that relaxed zoning laws, finding that greater density significantly reduced rents.
Also, your logic isn’t quite rightโimagine how expensive NYC and Hong Kong would be *without* high-rises.
The housing crisis exists because we lack enough housing. Any solution must involve building more.
People need houses, and they need jobs. Dense housing near the T brings the two together.
Even if rents are completely unaffected, not having to drive as often is a huge financial boon to many, especially those with lower incomes, where car/gas/insurance are a large part of their income.
It would be great if we could build dense housing and maintain the status quo for The Burren through that work. No matter where such housing gets built, it’s going to affect someone, though, and if this project goes forward, I think Davis Square will be even better for the new incarnation of The Burren. I’m hopeful that McCarthyโs and Toad will be able to help to support it in the interim.
The local economy is growing, the population is increasing, and people need housing. If they canโt live here, theyโll drive in from elsewhere, which harms everyone.
Regardless of rent impacts, we need more housing, especially near public transit.
I think the proposed building is way out of scale for the location – 4 or even 6 stories would fit much much better. I was in touch with the Mayor’s office about it and was told: “To be clear, this is not an official project, as no official application or special permits have been requested. Current zoning in this area allows for buildings up to four stories.” So, it’s anyone’s guess what will happen . . .
We need more housing, especially near public transit. This is an excellent spot for building of this scale.