More detail is asked on how new Middle East fits in Central Square, and saves ‘Crosswinds’ mural
The developer who wants to demolish and replace The Middle East nightclub and restaurant complex was told Thursday by the Cambridge Historical Commission to come back with more detail.
The building would include a hotel, restaurant and multiple music venues that would be continue to be run by the Saters, the family that has been operating the Middle East venues since 1969, commissioners were shown in a presentation. Before deciding whether to issue a demolition permit, commissioners wanted to see further plans about what Massachusetts Avenue storefronts would look like in the new project and the design of the building as part of the overall streetscape, as well as for the preservation of murals.
Patrick Barrett, the developer who represents the Saters, was amenable to a continuance, but wanted the commission to give specifics on preserving the mural “Crosswinds,” on the Brookline Street side of the existing building.
Daniel Galvez, who created the piece, “relied on the community for ideas, including images from local photographer Jeff Dunn, to show the ‘multicultural spirit’ of Central Square,” according to a commission report citing the Cambridge Arts agency. The mural was restored by Galvez in 2016.
“We don’t plan to simply ignore it, at the very minimum,” Barrett said. Among options for the piece would be to memorialize it in the new building, “and then we have a couple of ideas of how to actually put on a new mural very similar to what’s there now, sort of as a modern representation. We’re talking to the artists about that now.”
There is no way to preserve the actual mural, and any attempt to preserve or store it would end in it crumbling, Barrett said. There are already plans to capture images of the mural, but he does not know whether they would be used as part of a memorial, or on a building down the street.
Public commenters were mostly supportive of the project, but some agreed that there was not enough detail in Barrett’s plan. An image released by Barrett early in the process was seized on by critics as boxy and colorless – but was just a placeholder, he said, and not representative of the final look and feel of the building that would go up.
Maxine Patwardhan, while generally favoring the direction of the project, expressed concern that there was not adequate commitment to preservation. “I am not really sure how you make a decision on whether we’re preserving something if we don’t have real plans,” Patwardhan told commissioners.
Michael Monestime, a former music promoter and former executive director of the Central Square Business Improvement District, recognized the concerns but was confident Barrett has a “great plan” in response. He also highlighted the importance of cultural legacy of the building and that it continue in a new building.
“The experience inside the walls has a lot of significance. We fought like dogs all throughout Covid pushing off developers who wanted to bring labs to the site,” Monestime said. “For this to come back with a music venue is amazing. You just don’t see that – and we won’t get that in any other package.”
Barrett, whose bands have performed on Middle East stages, said he’s intent on bringing the music back.
“If we don’t try to help revitalize and preserve these assets, then they’re simply going to go away,” Barrett said.
Once again we have “developer speak” and pressure to destroy a heritage site in the city and to accept incomplete plans that are not thought out or properly presented with full architectural plans and preservation information for a historic building. It will end in tears, dust and failure as far as preserving anything, as it always seems to do in Cambridge. Seen this enough times over the past 25 years to know that the public interest and historical interests always lose to greed of developers and business folks.
Preservation? Heritage site? I’m a bit confused or maybe the article is missing something. We have an undistinguished building with a pop mural on one side. The only significant historical value is what the Saters themselves have created–a terrific music venue/community.
Perfectly fine to push for more detail and assurance on certain issues. But we should all be supporting this
LOL…..the SATERS created it all by themselves huh?
And you have is a mural representative of Cambridge past in all its inclusiveness.
What you see as an inconvenience others, myself include, see a symbol of what the future might hold.
Do we want to remember and honor ALL the people who helped to build the Middle East complex and Central Square in general into the destination it was/is……or do we want to accelerate the concentration of power and control?
No, we should not “all be supporting this” its a hotel site, in a congested area with insufficient parking or any plan to deal with such effectively.
Cambridge has a housing crisis for affordable housing, in part caused by developers who are looking for the “next great moneymaker” be it lab space or hotels or Air BnB or whatever rather than what the community needs or what the community wants.
As a music venue and restaurants the space fits a need in the community, as a hotel it does not, we already have 2 hotels within a few blocks of the site.
Razing the existing building, the mural etc. destroys part of the culture and history of the area…. and leaves the site unable to do its current function. We have already lost art spaces and culture spaces that the area it is in was recognized for. This is a greed grab for developers, who will flip their share of the site and leave the city to deal with the aftermath, as will in all likelihood the family currently owning the space. I suspect the family will not continue to be involved after the rebuild is green lighted, they’ll quietly sell off and run to avoid their critics… remember this venue got in trouble previously and lost a chunk of its good will in the music community before the pandemic for misconduct (back in Aug 2018) of Joseph Sater.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2018/08/29/owner-middle-east-nightclub-stepping-down-denies-online-claims-sexual-misconduct/OTNt145LQnORRncLdB33QL/story.html