Dan Totten: Experience and political courage needed to deliver on priorities from first day
My name is Dan Totten, and I am running for Cambridge City Council. I am a queer renter from Central Square who has served you as councillor Quinton Zondervan’s legislative aide for the past six years. At City Hall, I helped Quinton research and draft impactful legislation while running a robust constituent services operation that helped hundreds of residents navigate housing instability, eviction and homelessness. I’m very proud to have staffed the Ordinance Committee during what has been one of the most productive and collaborative councils in recent memory. After spending years behind the scenes working collaboratively to advance groundbreaking legislation such as the Green New Deal for Cambridge, the Cycling Safety Ordinance and the Affordable Housing Overlay 2.0, you can be confident that I will deliver meaningful results from day one.
As a Central Square resident who has worked closely with so many unhoused residents in our community, I am deeply motivated to get more people off the street. We need to spend more local resources intentionally on expanding wraparound care, case management and permanent supportive housing. We should set a goal of building 300 units of that housing within a few years. When Denver placed 365 people in this model, 77 percent of them remained stably housed after three years. My top priority is bringing that success to Cambridge through more intentional spending of local resources.
I’m also very passionate about achieving universal after-school care as quickly as possible. This past year, the city turned away 500 applicants (including 92 low-income applicants) who were left scrambling to find child-care during those critical hours between the end of school and the end of the workday. We need to support working families by ending the uncertainty so that every kid has appropriate and enriching after-school opportunities, including potentially through an ordinance if the city manager will not act. Getting this done is essential for addressing the persistent racial and economic achievement gaps that exist in our schools.
I am committed to eradicating systemic racism, classism, transphobia and ableism in the city. Here are some other important issues I will focus on if elected:
- Confronting the mental health crisis in our schools by adding dedicated mental health professionals and having a deeper conversation about how to better support the needs of gender-nonconforming students.
- Creating a municipal voucher program so that more low-income people can live comfortably in our city.
- Raising the minimum wage for city employees to at least $25 an hour.
- Investing in key environmental justice initiatives such as Jerry’s Pond and the Squirrel Brand Community Garden in North Cambridge and The Port, respectively.
- Restricting new biotech (nonresidential) development, especially in the Central Square Cultural District.
- Securing improvements to municipal buildings in the eastern part of the city, including at the Moses Youth Center, Windsor Street Health Clinic, Central Square Library, the vacant schoolhouse at 105 Windsor St., Fletcher Maynard Academy and Kennedy-Longfellow and Cambridgeport schools. Also, working with community partners to establish clear timelines for renovating the Inman Square Apartments, YMCA Central House and 240 Albany St.
- Supporting establishment of the Cambridge American Freedman Commission.
- Supporting Cambridge Heart, our city’s trusted alternative to the police.
- Implementing the Green Jobs Ordinance to create more economic opportunity for our young people and working with members of the School Committee to expand RSTA, the technical arts program at the high school.
- Constructing affordable and intentional LGBTQ+ senior housing following national models such as Brooklyn’s Stonewall House.
- Requiring the city to provide safer options for unhoused trans, nonbinary and gender nonconforming residents within in the shelter system, including units with doors that lock and a private bath/shower.
- Investing in automated, accessible entryways at every municipal building.
- Improving pedestrian safety by installing 100 additional flashing crosswalks at intersections throughout the city.
- Filing a home rule petition that seeks permission from the state to expand nightlife hours in Central and Harvard, working with councillor Marc McGovern.
Cambridge has the resources to tackle these challenges, including hundreds of millions of dollars in unallocated revenue (known as free cash). We have a responsibility to spend more of the spoils of our biotech boom on addressing the cost of living for low-income people and working families. Certainly, we can be proud of Cambridge’s status as an innovation leader while demanding that more resources go toward those who have been most deeply affected by the city’s recent transformation and by broader systemic racism, classism and ableism.
I have the experience and the political courage needed to deliver on these priorities from my very first day in office. I humbly ask that you consider voting me No. 1 on or before Tuesday. Together we can build a Cambridge that works for all of us, not just the wealthy and well-connected!
Dan Totten is a candidate for Cambridge City Council.
I am impressed with the ambitious list Mr. Totten has put forth. If he gets a fraction of his AGENDA done will be no small feat because he has to work with 8 other councilors. The one thing I didn’t see is how he plans to engage the public, educate them, outreach, find out their priorities and act as THEIR councilor, how he would work with others to achieve these goals. He only mentions is Marc McGovern who has a fraught track record of “unapologetically” pushing through policies before they are ready for prime time while being snarky to anyone who questions them. Totten’s retiring mentor suffers from the same grandiosity. That means no research or considering any long term unintended consequences. Approve first, plan HOW to implement second.
Here we have an example of a candidate coming in with a preconceived agenda, perhaps imposing certain issues which may or may not be a priority to constituents. That is not to say these ideas are not worthy. But, as seen in the forums, which are basically job interviews– we have seen from this candidate disrespect, an unwillingness to follow rules, talking over hosts, a potential lack of coordinating or compromising, listening or considering others’ points of view, or willingness for a MATURE open dialogue. He calls people names like homophobe, racist, NIMBY etc. He cheered Hamas. I do not think he has the ability to work with others.
He has been disruptive at other group events with a megaphone. He may have been useful as an editor to policies conjured by his own divisive mentor, but those policies helped eliminate the function of Conservation Districts, re-write “amendments” to the AHO 2.0 before the original review of 5 years expired, and some of the other ideological policies put forth without informing residents. I do not find this approach or character conducive to a steady, MATURE Councilor who is to represent ALL residents and not to use his position as a platform for his personal AGENDA. we have seen this before.
This is not transparent, data-based, investigative good governance, one that unites people, not pit them against each other in divisive fashion. We have seen that and it is why people are so angry this election.
If Mr Totten wants to pursue some of his laudable goals in some other fashion, I will support him. But not as a thoughtful, contextual collaborative city councilor which he has shown he is not.
Dan, I understand you are one of the candidates who would allow more 12- to 15-story buildings to be built in Cambridge. That’s a non-starter for me. For that reason, I can’t vote for you.
Danny, as I held back from vomiting while reading your campaign promises I couldn’t help but notice all that you left out.
* Your outrageous idea to defund the police.
* Your vicious callous attack on the Catholic Church.
* Your insane push for more bike lanes, decreased parking, and total disregard for small family owned businesses.
All of this and so much more is why I will NOT be voting for you. Of course, I would be remiss not to mention that you personally asked me -several times- to NOT vote for you.
Your combative nature and inability to listen to anyone with a different opinion should eliminate you from any consideration on this ballot. I truly hope that Cambridge voters unite and do NOT allow you a seat on “our” council.
Dan, I strongly support your work on climate, housing, and other initiatives. Thank you for running and you got my vote.
In case anyone wants to hear from Totten first-hand, you can read his anti-Catholic vilification at https://twitter.com/DanForCambridge/status/1371449190174298112?
Or antisemitic “River to Sea” post at https://twitter.com/DanForCambridge/status/1651736436650004480
Dan has done more than enough to earn my number 1 vote. He represents the potential in Cambridge to do all the good things we are capable of doing: Provide for the less fortunate, set our city as a leader in the green movements, and establish a clear pro-biker/pedestrian city that we ought to have. I wish more electeds were like Dan, but I will be thrilled to know we at least have him!
I’m also proud to give Dan my #1 vote. I’ve seen enough of him and his work to feel confident he is a person of the utmost character. He doesn’t strike me as “divisive” – but I’m glad he’s not fake either, and that he has principles. Principles he shares with me, and it seems, with too few people in this race. Like uplifting and defending our most vulnerable populations, even sometimes that means stirring the pot a little. I’m a lifelong Cantabrigian and I can safely say this pot needs some stirring. Dan strikes me as extremely knowledgable, thoughtful, and hard working guy, and I’m excited to see what he’ll accomplish on the council.