Nighttime work at former courthouse is stopped with License Commission’s rejection of variance
A bid to keep working into the night constructing the 40 Thorndike office tower project in East Cambridge was rejected unanimously Thursday by license commissioners, who didn’t see the hardship demanded for the variance.
If granted, the variance would have allowed work to extend after business hours until 11 p.m. every day but Sunday. (The License Commission’s agenda showed the request going until 10 p.m.) A current variance was to expire Thursday, only hours after the commission’s rejection.
The commission’s decision likely took developers Leggat McCall and Granite by surprise. A section of the project’s website for construction updates shows a post from before the meeting advising residents that “second-shift activities (6 to 11 p.m.) and selective Saturday work will continue to take place through February 2022.”
The question of the hardship came up a few times during the hourlong License Commission hearing, but Ed LaFlore, a principal for Burlington’s CSL Consulting, never had an answer that satisfied fed-up neighbors listening by Zoom or the three-member board.
“The hardship is the condition of the building and a lot of the dynamics associated with making sure that we can do the work in a safe environment for the workers,” LaFlore said, “as well as to push the project to minimize any future, unforeseen conditions that could lengthen the duration of the project.”
Acting police commissioner Christine Elow, taking part in her first License Commission hearing since her appointment, asked how much of the need was about worker safety and how much was about “wanting to move the project along faster,” and LaFlore made an argument about the complication of the project and number of workers on site.
Variance relies on hardship
The reply didn’t convince licensing chair Nicole Murati Ferrer. Though during rougher patches of the Covid pandemic the commission had given “a little more leeway” for variances to provide social distancing and make up for smaller crews, that moment has passed for what commission staff described as “an extension on an extension.”
“The legislative intent of our noise variance is pretty clear. There should not be any construction regardless of whether it’s noisy or not after certain hours, and the only way that we should be issuing a variance is if it constitutes an unreasonable hardship,” Ferrer said. “I just don’t think we’re at the unreasonable hardship at this time.”
Elow and acting fire chief Gerard Mahoney agreed with her summation that the request for additional hours seemed more about logistics.
Part of LaFlore’s argument was that the night work was quieter preparation for the crews that showed up to begin work promptly at 7 a.m. six days a week, and that in comparison with construction during the day, it drew no complaints – a claim softened to admit that there were just far fewer complaints. The final hour of work was just cleanup and removal of materials, LaFlore said, and the company didn’t intend to use the variance for Saturday. And there were a few supporters among the public who said during the call that they agreed with the underlying idea of efficiency. East Cambridge’s Mark Tang said he liked the idea of “eliminating yet another construction project within our neighborhood … so that we can all have peaceful days and peaceful evenings.”
“They’re just fed up”
The number of residents with complaints about frequent use of air horns and other noise, vibration, trucking and 7 a.m. starts was greater, though, and more bitter, with worries about the long-term effects of sleep deprivation after long periods of being “literally hemmed in every side” by construction. Resident Seth Diamond pointed to construction also taking place at the Millers River Apartments, at Lechmere and Gore Street, at Metropolitan Pipe and on the Volpe parcel.
Resident Hilary Ginsburg felt approval by the commission would “set a terrible precedent for after-hours construction [when] we need to protect the evening hours.”
A proposal by Mahoney that looked for a middle ground – that work be allowed to 11 p.m. through October while CSL hired acoustical engineers to resolve noise issues – wasn’t picked up on by the other commissioners.
“They’re just fed up with the continuous construction, not only at this location, but in surrounding areas,” Murati Ferrer said of the East Cambridge residents.
On track for 2023
Unmentioned during the hearing was that CSL’s request was at odds with claims about the project from Sept. 15, when an email from the developers called “interior demo and abatement nearing completion.” The request for a variance asked for an another five hours a day for potentially six days a week for another five months “to perform interior demolition and abatement.”
A request for an explanation was made Wednesday, but by Thursday evening there was no response.
The project is a renovation of the former 1970s-era Edward J. Sullivan Courthouse, which has been empty since June 2014 and deteriorating under the watch of the state Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance – to the point that residents living nearby worried about their health. A lawsuit and appeal, and then a battle over the parking disposition, delayed work at the courthouse by the developer, but LaFlore confirmed Thursday that the project is on track to open in the fall of 2023, but said the work advancing so quickly was “due to our ability to use these variances to do the work in the evening.”
Construction began in 2020 on the project, a 475,000-square-foot, 20-story office tower with 48 units of housing and retail space on its second and third floors.
Bono is happily surprised to learn that residents of East Cambridge will now be having their most elementary rights to peace and quiet respected once again. It’s a shame how hard we in Cambridge have to work and fight just to get even a good night’s sleep! Does anyone remember Leggat McCall and their various flaks and reps talking about wanting to have construction underway until 11 o’clock at night when they were cramming this through, with the shameful complicity of the (appointed) Cambridge Planning Board, and a compromised city administration shamefully “in the tank,” as they so often are?? It’s a rare “developer” who deserves ever to be trusted in Cambridge. Hence Bono counsels, “GET IT IN WRITING!” (Ahead of time!)
To note that the residential units proposed for this projects are only 24 not 48.
and through the community involvement process it was possible to assure them as all affordable in perpetuity, instead of the 8 originally offered.
So I welcome the scrutiny of these projects, to secure more affordable housing, even in a controversial building as this, even with a developer quite cavalier with the neighbors they do not like(they seem to like some more than others).
One correction: plenty of us complained about pre-7 am starts. I might not be thrilled with the noise between the legal work hours of 7 am and 6 pm, but it’s legal (to a point; there are maximum noise levels even for construction), and construction is noisy, but I have not complained about it. They also regularly block Third Street, even though they have Thorndike Street completely closed off, and they have a garage that they could use. All in all, as I said before, they are terrible neighbors.
Later on the License Commission agenda was a hearing on repeated deliveries to the Alewife Whole Foods outside of legal hours. Instead of ignoring those complaints, the store manager at least claimed that he turned away deliveries that could not be accommodated during legal hours.
If Leggat McCall sent workers home who sit in their idling trucks until 7 am or sent trucks away if they show up before 7 am, then I might believe they have some recognition of the fact that they are not the only people in the world who matter. The License Commission did the right thing, and I hope that every other entitled developer takes notice and acts accordingly. If you can’t get your work done in the 64 hours a week the law gives you, then maybe you need to find a new job. The neighbors are people, too.
Fabrizio, the number of units was upped to 48 in September 2019, upon City Council adoption of the plan. https://www.cambridgeday.com/2019/09/18/siddiqui-demands-more-affordable-housing-less-parking-to-see-courthouse-plan-pass-6-3/
Ah, yes, the last-minute deal that was sprung on everyone and subject to absolutely zero scrutiny by anybody because why should the public or the rest of the City Council have any opportunity to weigh in on anything the size of this? Transparency is so old-fashioned a notion. Why, if people looked at this for longer than a nanosecond, they might notice what a gigantic giveaway it was to the developer: https://www.cambridgeday.com/2019/09/19/last-minute-deal-for-courthouse-squandered-council-power-to-developers-financial-gain/.