
Challengers Paul Toner and Burhan Azeem were elected to the City Council and incumbent Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler was defeated in a preliminary count completed at 1:10 a.m. Wednesday, while newcomer Akriti Bhambi was elected to the School Committee.
That returns seven incumbents to the nine-seat council for the two-year term starting in January, when they will have to hire the next city manager and grapple with continued housing pressures. Five incumbents will return to the six-seat committee, which must complete a return to normalcy after two years of pandemic.
Voters also passed three ballot questions dealing with the city charter, which hasnโt been updated since adoption 80 years ago. Their passage means the next council will have new powers to confirm all people named to boards and commissions by the city manager and must undertake a more sweeping review of the charter for potential changes. They are also required to do annual reviews of the manager.
Pandemic restrictions meant there were fewer candidates than usual attending the count by the Election Commission and its staff in the Citywide Senior Center in Central Square โ in fact, the only candidate present was Caroline Hunter, who ran for School Committee โ and the late hour of returns meant little reaction on social media.
โI’m so honored,โ Azeem tweeted only minutes after results were made public. Tonerโs social media was silent overnight.
Among incumbents returning to the council, Patty Nolan certainly had the liveliest response: She posted a video to Facebook of her dancing in delight to her reelection and the passage of the ballot questions, which resulted from a process she spearheaded in her first term on the council. โSo thrilled that I won and that all three ballot questions passed resoundingly,โ she said, adding on Twitter that having all threeย questions pass was โfantastic results โฆ I worked hard to bring change to our city charter. Thrilled to see the results.โ
Incumbents Marc McGovern and E. Denise Simmons were more subdued. โI am so honored to be returning to the City Council. Congratulations to everyone who ran. It is not easy to throw your hat in the ring,โ McGovern said. โI promise to do my best to be a bold, compassionate leader for our city.โ Simmons said via Twitter that after what she feared was a โvery tight race,โ she was โthrilled to be heading back.โ

Mayor Sumbul Siddiqui only added to her No. 1 votes from two years ago, making a giant leap to 3,861 top-ranked votes in the preliminary count from 2,431 despite there being fewer ballots cast this year. She was once again the only council candidate to immediately achieve the โquotaโ needed to be elected in Cambridgeโs proportional representation, ranked-choice form of voting. Simmons, who had been the second-highest vote-getter two years ago, dropped by 274 moving into her 11th term in office; Nolan moved ahead of her with 1,831 top-ranked votes for her second term as a councillor.
Challengers who didnโt win a council seat in this election were philosophical. Joe McGuirk, running for the first time, wrote ahead of learning the results that โIt has been an amazing experience and regardless of the results, I am so very glad I ran. I have met incredible people, spoke with so many fellow residents, and learned so much.There are so many wonderful people in Cambridge. We are all fortunate to live here.โ
Robert Eckstut, a poker player who spoke with arch humor during candidate forums and in questionnaire responses, continued his blunt approach as election results rolled out: โLooks like I’m getting crushed โฆ I didn’t expect to do well, but damn! Expected more than that. Oof,โ he tweeted. โBased on my vote counter and prelim stuff I expected a bit more than 100 with an average of 200; looks like I ended around 70. Oops!โ

On the School Committee side, Ayesha Wilson actually topped Siddiqui, getting at 3,968 top-ranked ballots for her second term in office with fewer overall voters for the year and in the committee race. It was accomplished without mailers or digital advertising, she said Wednesday morning.
โThis means that this win belongs to volunteers who knocked on doors, made calls and shared my campaign with their families and communities. I heard from a number of voters this year who were worried about the role of money in Cambridge elections, but with around $10,000 in spending, we won more No. 1 votes than anyone in Cambridge in 30 years,โ Wilson said. โI’m also very excited to welcome Akriti Bhambi to the Committee and to continue serving with my colleagues Fred Fantini, Rachel Weinstein, Jose Luis Rojas Villarreal and David Weinstein.โ
Wilson was followed by its longest-serving member, Fred Fantini. He will be serving his 20th term in officer. Bhambi, running for the first time but with a background in health public policy and experience as chief of staff for state Rep. Marjorie Decker, was third at 2,824 top-ranked ballots.
Committee candidates were silent overnight on social media, but Hunter took it in stride when learning at the vote count that she had been edged out by incumbentย Jose Luis Rojas Villarreal, whose No. 1 votes numbered just 106 more than her own. But she has a long history of fighting for social justice from outside the seat of power โ in 1970, as a new employee at Polaroid, she spotted the companyโs involvement in abetting South Africaโs notorious apartheid government and alerted her co-workers. She and future husband Ken Williams lost their jobs but ultimately succeeded in shaming the company into abandoning its business with the country.

The presence of new members on each of Cambridgeโs elected bodies was guaranteed this year. Tim Toomey announced in June that he would retire after a run of public service lasting more than 35 years; and committee vice chair Manikka Bowman, who has served since 2015, chose not to run for reelection in July, citing family needs.
A Toomey endorsement of Toner had a powerful effect; four years ago, when Toner first tried for a council seat, he came in ninth in No. 1 votes and failed to win a seat. This year, an analysis from a competing candidate showed Toner strong in East Cambridge โ Toomeyโs neighborhood and his power base โ and he rose to 1,613 top-ranked votes from 980.
Safety precautions among the coronavirus pandemic made this a peculiar election: campaign forums moved online, followed by debate among voters, though some candidates opted out either in general or from specific forums hosted by groups with which they disagreed. Retail campaigning didnโt stop, and candidates from longtime councillor McGovern to first-time challenger Theodora Skeadas expressed exhaustion from the effort in recent conversations.ย
The pandemic also changed the nature of the vote count itself. Instead of candidates, staffers, media and the public crowding as usual into the Citywide Senior Center in Central Square, only three non-election staffers were allowed in at a time. Cambridge Community Television broadcast from its studio, rather than the senior center cafeteria. And paper results from precinct voting machines were posted at the front of the center so people could read them from the sidewalk, rather than inside to be read in a hallway.
![]()
Feature image of Mayor Sumbul Siddiqui is from Siddquiโs Twitter account.


ย 

For the second election in a row, Cambridge’s voters proved that they are not afraid of new housing. It’s gratifying to know that the vocal opponents of housing are not representative.
People always love ponies until they realize someone has the handle the back end….
This seems to be a slightly outdated tally in order, but if Cambridge is so focused on new housing as a single issue, why did Dennis Carlone and Patty Nolan do so well? Weren’t they your anti-housing targets? Dennis, BTW, is helping a neighborhood to redesign affordable housing block from a monolithic solid wall to a human scale reconfiguration of massing and open space WITH THE SAME NUMBER OF UNITS. This has always been part of the problem with the AHO. There is no design review or oversight with teeth for a better project.
Likewise, Jivan Sabrino–Wheeler, part of the machinery couched in green sentiment, didn’t get re-elected. He was to sponsor a bill re-writing the AHO to allow 13 stories (instead of 8) on corridors and 6 stories (instead of 4) in neighborhoods, again without neighborhood input or design review and only suggestions from the planning board. This endgame was to do a run around the rejection of 9 stories (with one elevator) at 2072 Mass Ave on a busy corner. The developers were looking for 17 variances or exceptions to any zoning. So why not just change the whole zoning so as not to interfere with future plans?
The AHO passed with the reassurance that Conservation Districts would be left intact and respected. Now that we have it, it’s time to amend everything many had believed.
Cambridge is not afraid of new housing. It would be nice to have entities say what they mean and mean what they say, consider those who have worked hard for their property, and allow for good design and mixed housing instead of ware-housing the underprivileged.
Cambridge is going to have to live with these buildings for a long time. We can have both good design for the health of residents and more units. But no… the goal posts keep moving.
The pro-housing peeps are a single-issue machine connected to a couple of councillors.
This is not an all or nothing movement. As with anything, there are nuances and compromises representing ALL the people. I hope the latest youngster can think for himself.
Peteโ
Nobody is claiming that there was universal support in Cambridge for pro-housing candidates. Naturally thereโs going to be some support for candidates who express skepticism toward new housing. But their voters clearly represent a minority viewpoint in this city. ABC-endorsed candidates earned 64 percent of the #1 votes cast; CCCโs slate got only 24 percent of the #1 votes.
Regarding Jivan: By no means does his unfortunate loss indicate support for new housing is on the wane. On the contraryโBurhan is an even stronger supporter of building more housing! After all, he got his start in Cambridge politics as a member of ABC.
You can absolutely expect to see Burhan give his support to amending the AHO to allow 2072 Mass Ave by right. You say that doing so would be an end around the BZA, but the opposite is true. The BZA is an end around. The head of the BZA himself has said that if Council wants nine stories built on Mass Ave, then they should change the zoning.
โSo why not just change the whole zoning so as not to interfere with future plans?โ
Fantastic idea Pete.