Cyclists travel in a "people-protected bike lane," with supporters where plastic bollards could go between cars and bikes, at the Thursday rally.
Bicycles and bicyclists mass in Porter Square on Thursday for a rally. Nate Fillmore, of the Cambridge Bicycle Safety group, is at center. (Photos: Tom Meek)

Bicycle safety advocates didnโ€™t crowd City Hall on Monday to support an order for protected bike lanes and bicycle traffic signals in Porter Square because, one said, they already made their feelings known โ€“ at a protest held Thursday in the square where two people died in 2016.ย 

โ€œWe turned out 200 people on this very topic,โ€ said Nate Fillmore, of the Cambridge Bicycle Safety group, describing to city councillors the crowds, marching band and โ€œpeople-protected bike laneโ€ that formed to protest official findings that the design of the square played no role in the death of bicyclist Bernard โ€œJoeโ€ Lavins. โ€œThis is obviously false. Anyone who walks or bikes through Porter knows how dangerous it can be.โ€ย (Lavins, 60, died in October 2016; pedestrianย Marcie Mitler, 63, was killed by a car eight months earlier.)

Councillors agreed Porter made for confusing and unsafe travel โ€“ councillor Dennis Carlone said he biked there once and never went back โ€“ and passed an order calling for the city manager to prioritize bike and pedestrian safety in its changes, adding protected bike lanes and signals where appropriate. The city manager was also asked to continue community outreach efforts to ensure different perspectives were heard; bike safety infrastructure in Harvard Square and on Cambridge Street has been controversial with drivers and business owners, despite Cambridge Street changes getting a more extensive public process.

Council debate

Approval among the councillors was slowed not just by a call for more outreach and process, but by early opposition from councillor Craig Kelley and others over what seemed to be an incomplete solution. Kelley, focused on a tricky left turn, said, โ€œI donโ€™t know how separated bike lanes are going to address a turning issue here.โ€

Proponents of the order, which was written by Quinton Zondervan, Carlone and vice mayor Jan Devereux, took pains to call it a โ€œbaby stepโ€ as the city considered larger changes.

โ€œCouncillor Devereux and I went to a neighborhood meeting three years ago now and we were told nothing can change โ€“ the curbs canโ€™t change,โ€ Carlone said. โ€œAnd my first reaction is, โ€˜Why not?โ€™ When you have one of the most dangerous and busiest intersections in the city, and we have a Vision Zero policy [for zero traffic deaths], thatโ€™s exactly where you put the money.โ€

Cyclists travel in a “people-protected bike lane,” with supporters where plastic bollards could go between cars and bikes, at the Thursday rally.

E. Denise Simmons worried that moving forward on the changes โ€œpit groups of people against each other,โ€ and fellow councillor Alanna Mallon echoed those concerns and wondered if Porter Square was where to focus efforts. When Devereux said months could be spent looking at other locations but Porter was the only place two people had died within a year, Mallon pointed to Putnam Avenue, where singer-songwriter and political activist Marcia Deihl was killed riding a bicycle in March 2015, and where a 14-year-old rider was hurt a block away last month, telling media that โ€œI couldโ€™ve died.โ€

McGovernโ€™s plea

As the conversation became rancorous, with Devereux expressing surprise at the pushback as being โ€œnonsensicalโ€ in a city that had adopted Vision Zero and Zondervan saying he was โ€œstunnedโ€ at objections โ€“ย and Kelley responding that it was offensive he might be described as not prioritizing safety โ€“ย the mayor stepped in.

Accepting a share of blame on behalf of the previous council for a lack of process on Harvard Square bike lanes, Mayor Marc McGovern pointed out that there was a process for Cambridge Street (a discussion of tweaks hasnโ€™t been called because the city is still gathering data, he said) and suggested an approach councillors could take in Porter Square and to think about changes more broadly.

โ€œMy plea, to the community as well as to us, is that we say all the time weโ€™re for safety โ€“ but every little thing becomes a battle, and it makes me wonder if people are ever going to be able to come together to agree on anything that involves bike infrastructure,โ€ McGovern said.

Changes proposed in Porter Square and other parts of the city โ€œmay make it more difficult for me as a driver, but you know what? Iโ€™m also terrified Iโ€™m going to hit someone,โ€ McGovern said.

Change on the way

Fillmore, the bike safety advocate, expressed relief afterward that changes had been adopted, since even Kelleyโ€™s initial concerns about how protected bike lanes help a left turn had an answer: Installing plastic bollards would stop drivers from using the lane to pick up or drop off passengers, which forces bicyclists out of the space theyโ€™d use to turn.

But changes may have been on the way even without council debate.

Feedback on Porter Squareโ€™s redesign heard at a community meeting in January has changed plans, Zondervan said. In a new design to be shown by the cityโ€™s Traffic, Parking & Transportation Department at 6 to 8 p.m. May 8 meeting at Lesley Universityโ€™s Hall Amphitheater, 1815 Massachusetts Ave., Porter Square, there is some protected bike lane and adjustments to traffic signals to help bike safety.

โ€œAnd all weโ€™re doing here is giving some extra impetus to say, โ€˜Please look at this, because we donโ€™t want anyone else to die on our streets,โ€™โ€ Zondervan said.

A stronger

Please consider making a financial contribution to maintain, expand and improve Cambridge Day.

We are now a 501(c)3 nonprofit and all donations are tax deductible.

Please consider a recurring contribution.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. I live in Porter Square, and I have been biking daily through this intersection to East Cambridge the past two years. The current city proposal from a 5-phase to 3-phase signal is an improvement in traffic flow. I’m generally a very strong supporter of Cambridge Bike Safety; I’m even on their mailing list. However, I believe their suggestions will heavily sacrifice car traffic flow for minimal bike and pedestrian benefit.

    Bike left turn on Mass ave onto Somerville Ave. The DA report on Joe Lavins was absolutely wrong. As a cyclist, having to merge across two lanes of car traffic was asking for an accident. That said, adding a separate bike left turn was the right solution. The current problem is that the bike left turn is over 45 seconds delayed compared to other left turning car traffic, that using the car lanes is attractive. The 3-cycle traffic improves traffic flow and incentivizes the use of the bike left turn.

    The Somerville Ave pedestrian walkway (between T and CVS) is another historic issue. The signal time is increasing from 24 to 35 seconds, and I really never seen slow pedestrians get marooned on the pedestrian island. The island is mostly useful for jay-walkers who wish to travel on off-signal periods. I’m not judging; I myself have traversed this intersection on off-signal periods with light traffic. Again, a faster intersection cycle time reduces the need to risk jay-walking.

    I really don’t understand the benefit of protected bike lanes in this particular intersection. The real danger is merging in the actual intersection, not getting hit while traveling. I do agree with reasonable traffic calming measures.

    The striped pavement with rocks in front of the CVS is heavily underutilized. It is really incredibly absent of pedestrian traffic. I really hope a long-term design incorporates this to improve overall intersection safety.

    I live one block away from Porter Square, and pass through this intersection by bike, car, and walking over 1000 times a year. I hope my humble perspective can be useful for decision makers. I hope to inject some moderation to this contentious issue.

Leave a comment