Alewife moratorium vote revives complaints around the lack of action on Envision zoning
The idea of stopping office and lab space from being added in the Alewife area until city planning is in place passed the City Council in 7-0-2 vote Monday.
But that moratorium needs its own process. What the council approved is a proposal for zoning that now must go to its Ordinance Committee and to the Planning Board before returning for possible enactment, the city clerk explained. Two councillors opted not to vote on the motion: Tim Toomey, who used his “charter right” last week to delay discussion on it until this week; and E. Denise Simmons.
The motion quickly became a means for councillors to express frustration over the failure to put zoning in place that would create a coherent neighborhood with a mix of businesses, homes, open space and public amenities.
“This as a plea to the city to say we have literally asked for 40 years for zoning in this area. We want it, we’re serious,” said councillor Patty Nolan, the writer of the motion. “All you have to do is look at the fact that the 1979 Alewife plan and the 2019 Envision Alewife plan look remarkably similar. And yet we have not managed yet to put in place zoning to realize this vision.”
Nolan’s order was inspired by the sudden arrival of Healthpeak, a Denver company that has spent $391 million buying land around Alewife since August and, she said, is preparing to spend an additional $225 million in the area.
Though a moratorium may be resolved by the time Healthpeak has a plan for its land to present, it could disrupt work by The Davis Cos. that is already following city planning goals, according to Chris Chandor, an executive with the real estate firm. A project in the area will “deliver a significant portion of a multi-use bike path,” Chandor told councillors during a public comment period. “If this development moratorium were to go through, that would stop … dead in its tracks for at least two years.”
Length of moratorium
Nolan suggested the moratorium could be short. Fellow councillor Dennis Carlone, an urban planner, made that seem unlikely.
“The Envision policy order that I wrote called for planning and urban design. You can’t do zoning without urban design; you have to test different principles, and that has never happened. A very beautiful illustrative drawing was done of what could happen. That’s not an urban design plan,” Carlone said. “I wrote a memo two or three years ago about what was necessary after we saw the initial drawing. And I said, ‘It doesn’t even come close.’
“I know this is the right move because it’s the only way we’re going to get a real study done of how to implement all the words that have been created [that] can be interpreted thousands of way,” Carlone said.
Lack of follow-through
The three-year, $6 million Envision process, which was fought over in the council for years before its start, was finished and presented in November 2019, but not acted on through a comprehensive city process afterward; some councillors have held committee hearings on parts of it. Envision focused on Alewife first after city staff acknowledged that “the speed of development and specifics of design have caused some to be concerned about the overall direction of development in the area.” But even the Alewife parts of the plan haven’t gotten a process satisfying to councillors or residents; in February the boards, advisory committees and coordinating committees of six neighborhood groups wrote an open letter to elected officials to complain about the lack of implementation for it and other community planning processes.
That complaint was renewed Monday in public comment.
“If the city is going to spend millions of dollars to plan, utilize public input and utilize the public process in the way that it does, it really ought to follow through,” said Patrick Barrett, a participant in “red ribbon” and “C2” processes in Central Square that, like those in Alewife, never got formal follow-through after initial presentations to the council. “I feel for my friends in Alewife, but Central Square has been waiting for more than a decade.”
What Mr. Chandor refers to as a simple “path” was in fact proposed by the Envision Alewife Plan to be a “three-acre linear open space” that would be the District’s “most dramatic open space transformation,” a park-like public space designed to “serve as an amenity and catalyst for future development in the Quadrangle.” Mr. Chandor categorizing it as nothing more than a connecting path rather than as a critical and long-desired public open space project is indicative of how so many developers approach Alewife: under promise, under deliver. The only thing stopping Mr Chandor’s employer The Davis Companies from completing this path/park is their own desire to use this as a future bargaining chip in re-zoning discussions. How nice of them to hold an entire neighborhood hostage for their own private gain.
@Doug…..why should it be any different from Kendall square?
Grand give aways of space with the promise of preserving certain public space like The Roof Top Garden?
How long until Google started nibbling away at it? How long until it was totally gone?
At the end of the day, the council will play ball with the developers because someone has to pay for that pony….
I guess now CDD can finally tell us what a lab is.
I’d like to know what Carlone is talking about. The 214 page Envision plan has an entire section on Urban Form and planning that is multiple pages with action items etc. This entire conversation is stuck in some kind of feedback loop where Public blames City blames Council blames Public … it is exactly like theatre.