Board decision will dismantle Starlight Square after three years of outdoor Cambridge events
A fourth season of the outdoor entertainment complex Starlight Square was rejected Thursday by Cambridge’s Board of Zoning Appeal, promising change to the landscape of Central Square and the city culturally as well as physically. The colorful scaffold-and-scrim structure has been a destination since Aug. 8, 2020, for everything from improv comedy to public school events.
Renewal got three out of five members’ votes, when four were needed to pass.
In a wry coincidence, one of the events scheduled if Starlight was approved to open was a summit on the role of public space in the city – an event that now needs to find another home.
“While we’re devastated, our organization has always rallied in a crisis. This is another moment for us to do so on behalf of the Cultural District,” said Michael Monestime, president of the Central Square Business Improvement District, in a Friday press release. There were no details available on what the BID would do to recover from the vote and loss of Starlight.
Though the conclusion shocked some in attendance, the reasons behind the votes against were not new: Those living nearest Starlight Square complain that the noise from it is disruptive, though it was acknowledged that the attraction had not otherwise changed the nature of Central Square, such as by adding traffic.
Starlight is behind the H Mart grocery store, with access via Graffiti Alley from Massachusetts Avenue and borders defined by Norfolk Street and Bishop Allen Drive.
Board vote
Board member Slater Anderson captured the conflict in his remarks: “I’m not interested in approving this indefinitely. I still I feel like we’re getting the same complaints that we’ve had for three years from the immediate abutters.”
Yet Anderson wound up being a vote in favor of keeping Starlight with chair Brendan Sullivan and member Andrea Hickey. Vice chair Jim Monteverde and associate member Wendy Leiserson were opposed.
For them, noise complaints outweighed significant support from city councillors, the mayor and city manager and state representatives, as well as a slew of callers and letter writers, and a new promise by the BID to look at a mitigation fund for people suffering from Starlight Square noise.
“We could soundproof windows [and buy] air conditioners if folks couldn’t open their windows to have a breeze come in. Through dialogue, we would be able to better understand what those one-on-one fixes might be,” Monestime told the board. Though his organization had reached out to neighbors to make these assessments, “no one has taken us up on it.”
Public comment
The handful of complaints were extreme, including a resident who identified herself only as Emily and said Starlight Square had ruined summers for her and gave her panic attacks. “I’m about to get one now, to be honest,” she said, referring to the first year of events as “torture.”
Another said it was hard to put their young children to sleep during events. Resident Michael James said that “because events are so late we can’t rest after work. We can’t be productive. We are even denied the opportunity to invite guests over the weekend because every weekend, there are events going on. And they’re going on until very late.” Starlight has been licensed until 9 p.m.
Others either questioned the noise complaints or found the tradeoff worthwhile, like Tony Clark, cofounder and co-president of My Brother’s Keeper Cambridge, and legislative aide Dan Totten. Former city councillor Nadeem Mazen, a longtime Central Square resident who said street noise and traffic was as loud as Starlight. “Some of the things I’ve heard in public comment. I’m just not on the same planet as these people,” Mazen said. “It would really behoove them to engage the organizers and look at sound mitigation.”
Dawning of Starlight
The complex opened during the Covid pandemic, when open-air events were the only safe way to gather. The initiative was led by the BID under the leadership of Monestime and had the help of the city in transforming its Municipal Parking Lot 5 to provide space for entertainment, gatherings such as school events and shopping. That included a Popportunity market made of small, local vendors – five out more than 100 of which graduated into their own bricks-and-mortar shops after the pandemic “forced 13 businesses to close,” Monestime said.
Events at Starlight are free to attend, subsidized by city government. The BID had paid out more than a quarter-million dollars to artists and organizers creating the free programming, Monestime said.
In 2021, it sounded like Starlight could be a permanent fixture of Central Square. Financial supporter Charlotte Wagner, of the Boston-based Wagner Foundation, said she hoped it “will be embedded in Central Square for many, many years to come.” Then-city manager Louis A. DePasquale said he was “committed to continue to work with the BID and with Michael to make sure that we preserve Starlight in our cultural district here or somewhere else. This is too important to give up.”
New conditions
A year ago, though, as Starlight Square sought to move from operating under a pandemic-era emergency order to more traditional permitting, the board decided against granting a full season, from May 1 to Oct. 31. Instead, it granted a half-season that gave operators until August to work with neighbors to address their concerns about noise. In July, they won a second half of a season after ending all programming at 9 p.m. from Monday to Saturday and 6 p.m. on Sunday; holding only two music events per week; monitoring sound levels; and installing drum shields.
In new conditions voted by the board. live music would be limited to the weekends – and drum circle performances be allowed only until 5 p.m. and live acoustic music to Fridays at 7 p.m. or Saturdays at 9 p.m.
That wasn’t enough to keep neighbors from complaining again this year about noise, even as acknowledged quality and public service component of Starlight’s events.
When board members voted, it was straight up or down, and the 3-2 vote missed the needed supermajority for a renewed permit.
Reactions to the decision
One resident attending the meeting, James Williamson, said he was surprised at the outcome – and that there wasn’t more effort to spare Starlight as a whole with more limits on hours and kinds of events, noting that the end of Starlight was a blow to the Popportunity markets. “It was shocking,” Williamson said of the outcome.
State Rep. Mike Connolly, who submitted a letter to the board in support of Starlight, said Friday that he too was surprised.
“I frankly never imagined they would deny the permit for season four of Starlight Square. I’m sad and disappointed the BZA couldn’t agree to a compromise,” Connolly said.
The full statement released Friday by Monestime:
Last night, Starlight Square was denied a special permit by the Board of Zoning Appeal. Two of the five members of the board chose to vote against issuing a special permit despite overwhelming public support, the support of the majority of city councillors and the city manager. This was Starlight’s third public hearing; it was heard and approved for the same special permit in March 2022 and again in July 2022.
For three years, throughout a pandemic, Starlight has been home to the best of the Cultural District, the public square that generations of Central Square residents have imagined and recommended through city planning. It has been a site of regeneration for the entire district, opening doors for artists, community organizers and local entrepreneurs while so many other spaces are closing – the Sound Museum, most recently.
Someone should spend time examining a system that empowers members of an unelected board to shut down a community benefit project which has the support of the mayor, vice mayor, city councillors, state representatives, community leaders and residents. That is not ours to do.
Our priority is to inform the growing community of people for whom Starlight is essential: the 80-plus programming applicants, the 60-plus Popportunity entrepreneurs, the steering committee and our other partners who invest time and energy year-round to offer free, public programming. Among upcoming events were a summit on the role of public space in the city; a fundraiser for humanitarian relief after the earthquakes in Turkey; the Cambridge Families of Color’s third annual Juneteenth celebration; a Cambridge Youth Council gathering; and much, much more.
We appreciate all of the people who spoke in support – it was a beautiful outpouring of what Starlight has made possible and for whom – and while we’re devastated, our organization has always rallied in a crisis. This is another moment for us to do so on behalf of the Cultural District.
The Cambridge City Council needs to find a way to overrule or override the Zoning Board so that culture can remain in Central Square.
This is really a shame.
The Board of Zoning Appeals is accountable to no one. Such is our so called democracy. Now we must move forward on developing affordable housing on that site!
The “culture” ain’t going nowhere.
There’s Cantab, Middle East complex, the Massosoit lodge, and various churches in the area.
Even with windows closed and AC running, it was unpleasant.
Thank. The. Lord.
This is a very sad situation. With the closure of other Central Square/Cambridgeport arts establishments this seems to be another step in draining arts uses from the Square.
Every effort should be made to rectify this situation or to find an alternative location.
I can’t comment on the validity of neighbor complaints, but I hope everyone realizes the magnitude of this loss.
Perhaps it’s true that Cambridge isn’t Cambridge any more.
Sam Noubert : Churches are not public culture, and the Middle East is trying to get itself out of existence if what we have seen in the papers for the past year or two are true.
I know nothing about the lodge or what may happen there or whether that brick building has sound leakage to complain about.
As long as performances end by 10 pm, why is this a problem for any neighbors?
Even now, some folks prefer to avoid indoor venues. Culture belongs outdoors during warm weather months.
Routine loud noise is undesirable in residential neighborhoods at any time, not just after 10pm. The noise ordinance we have in Cambridge acknowledges this.
How loud the noise from Starlight really was (I’d suspect it was greater than the traffic noise on nearby quiet streets) and whether this board is the best way to decide I don’t know. Of course it’s impossible for every City decision to be made by elected officials.
Also, when we count up those supporting Starlight, we have to ask how many do so in spite of living nearby. Perhaps the supporters mostly live elsewhere. The City sometimes needs to protect the minority from the majority.
Starlight was an open-air venue meant to be a temporary fix during Covid. It was a mistake to count on it for future engagements. If it continues – which would be a benefit to the public – doesn’t it need to do so in an indoor space with excellent soundproofing and good ventilation?
Amazing experience while it lasted. Great memories especially seeing each of my Cambridge-raised kids play in music concerts. e.g. Lenny’s Funk Club https://www.instagram.com/reel/CiP6C_mO8y_
Maybe the MDC will let us move that stage to the river!
Very sorry to hear this news. I miss Cambridge, don’t recognize it in this high-whine gentrified avatar.
Presumably the holdouts on the Zoning Board are fantasizing luxury condos on that lot–there are so many homeless rich people in Cambridge.
I bet none of the people complaining about the end of this live in Central. If you had to put up with noise all day outside your window you’d be singing a different tune.
Central square is a great representation of capitalism. It shows the clash between the privileged who can afford to pay the out of touch with reality rent prices and those who have been tossed aside by this society. It’s also a great representation of city hall’s decision to continually side with real estate developers. City hall likes to pretend it’s a progressive, woke city but it shows its true colors when it continues to pass laws that favor real estate developers and Harvard instead of members of it’s community. City council doesn’t care that the cost of living here is forcing immigrants and minorities out of the city.
I see this as one more example of our lack of viable city planning and instead leaving it up to residents to hash things out with commercial interests, often pitting one against the other at BZA, planning board, CHC and city council and other meetings. Lots of anger and frustration that could be avoided if there was actual planning done. Sometimes the residents win (closing memorial drive on weekends), sometimes the real estate investment interests win (keeping big banks as a major feature of Harvard Square) against the neighborhood group and people who live and work here, sometimes ideology wins (the many dedicated bicycle lanes over local businesses and many local resident concerns around parking). In this specific case no one wins. If we are going to ask people to live in the city (and to raise their kids here) and not drive, then there should be some way of planning around issues of sound so that things end much earlier and only on certain occasions. Or place great additions like this where there are no residential neighbors. More to the point, why was the City (CDD) not involved in this, in writing a plan, bringing into play the various viewpoints, and finding a way to balance the interests of both groups?
There are plenty of locations in Cambridge that would be great for an outdoor performance venue. How about the plaza with the Kendall ice rink? Close to transit, no residential neighbors, and plenty of restaurants nearby.
It shows extremely poor leadership from Monestime to cry undemocratic only when he doesn’t get his way.
We have procedures and checks and balances in local and nationwide government that ensure all voices can be heard and the law is followed. The BZA is one of those bodies that listens to the petitioners and the neighborhood to make a decision regardless if they are in the minority or the majority. Its members are appointed by the city manager.
Attacking their authority directly because you didn’t get your way gives me stop the count Jan 6th vibes. Thinking that you are above the law and can side step procedures is very much authoritarian. It’s also quite hypocritical given that the central square BID is a unelected authority over central square that advances business interest including luxury condos and hotels in the area.
John Hawkinson another Cambridge day reporter noted the cited bylaws in his twitter thread: https://twitter.com/johnhawkinson/status/1633986290726182913
By Starlights own numbers they are reporting sound in the 70 decibels and 80 decibels range (as this is self reported it might even be higher) this is far from street noise on this planet and we have city ordinances that protects residential areas from consistent noise at this level. If these ordinances were removed tomorrow it’s likely that most of the city would be in protest.
Calming to do good at the expense of others is misguided intention
Re-posting link as it was not properly hyperlinked in previous comment:
https://twitter.com/johnhawkinson/status/1633986290726182913